Commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration

Commanders in Control examines the four internationally-funded disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) programmes in Afghanistan between 2003 and 2014. It argues that although on paper they were part of Western powers’ ambitious state building project, in reality they served the U.S.-led...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Derksen, Linde Dorien
Other Authors: Lieven, Peter Paul Anatol ; Farrell, Theo Gerard
Published: King's College London (University of London) 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.721674
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-721674
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7216742019-01-29T03:22:52ZCommanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administrationDerksen, Linde DorienLieven, Peter Paul Anatol ; Farrell, Theo Gerard2017Commanders in Control examines the four internationally-funded disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) programmes in Afghanistan between 2003 and 2014. It argues that although on paper they were part of Western powers’ ambitious state building project, in reality they served the U.S.-led military campaign against the Taliban as one of the mechanisms through which foreign support to armed groups was either given or withheld. By targeting different groups in different ways and at different times, DDR programmes were shaped by the wider political context – namely the fight against the Taliban and the movement’s continued political exclusion. By examining the programmes’ impact on individual commanders in four provinces – two in the northeast and two in the southwest – this study shows that the programmes deepened this pattern of exclusion. Local allies of international troops used them to reinforce their own position and target rivals. Those targeted often sought alternative ways of remaining armed, including by joining the insurgency. Thus, DDR – which was largely used to strengthen those winning and demobilise those losing – promoted not peace, as some foreign donors expected, but war. The main lesson from the Afghan experience is that DDR amidst war can generate instability and violence. This is especially the case when significant armed groups are excluded and portrayed as irreconcilable even when representing communities’ genuine grievances – the case in Afghanistan and other countries on the sharp end of the War on Terror like Iraq and Somalia. The state in these places is too weak to permanently exclude large groups, even with international military support. This means that to gain more control over the use of force – which is usually the objective of DDR – it must find a way to accommodate, not exclude, the main militarised patronage networks. In Afghanistan this means including the Taliban.958.104King's College London (University of London)https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.721674https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/commanders-in-control(3649e61e-9a33-4456-94f3-ba90c2dc3d6f).htmlElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 958.104
spellingShingle 958.104
Derksen, Linde Dorien
Commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration
description Commanders in Control examines the four internationally-funded disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) programmes in Afghanistan between 2003 and 2014. It argues that although on paper they were part of Western powers’ ambitious state building project, in reality they served the U.S.-led military campaign against the Taliban as one of the mechanisms through which foreign support to armed groups was either given or withheld. By targeting different groups in different ways and at different times, DDR programmes were shaped by the wider political context – namely the fight against the Taliban and the movement’s continued political exclusion. By examining the programmes’ impact on individual commanders in four provinces – two in the northeast and two in the southwest – this study shows that the programmes deepened this pattern of exclusion. Local allies of international troops used them to reinforce their own position and target rivals. Those targeted often sought alternative ways of remaining armed, including by joining the insurgency. Thus, DDR – which was largely used to strengthen those winning and demobilise those losing – promoted not peace, as some foreign donors expected, but war. The main lesson from the Afghan experience is that DDR amidst war can generate instability and violence. This is especially the case when significant armed groups are excluded and portrayed as irreconcilable even when representing communities’ genuine grievances – the case in Afghanistan and other countries on the sharp end of the War on Terror like Iraq and Somalia. The state in these places is too weak to permanently exclude large groups, even with international military support. This means that to gain more control over the use of force – which is usually the objective of DDR – it must find a way to accommodate, not exclude, the main militarised patronage networks. In Afghanistan this means including the Taliban.
author2 Lieven, Peter Paul Anatol ; Farrell, Theo Gerard
author_facet Lieven, Peter Paul Anatol ; Farrell, Theo Gerard
Derksen, Linde Dorien
author Derksen, Linde Dorien
author_sort Derksen, Linde Dorien
title Commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration
title_short Commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration
title_full Commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration
title_fullStr Commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration
title_full_unstemmed Commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in Afghanistan under the Karzai administration
title_sort commanders in control : disarmament demobilisation and reintegration in afghanistan under the karzai administration
publisher King's College London (University of London)
publishDate 2017
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.721674
work_keys_str_mv AT derksenlindedorien commandersincontroldisarmamentdemobilisationandreintegrationinafghanistanunderthekarzaiadministration
_version_ 1718968991888703488