The effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency

The experience of feeling responsible for the outcomes of one's actions is known as the sense of agency. The phenomenon of reduced perceived temporal proximity between actions and their effects is thought to implicitly index the sense of agency, and is known as temporal or intentional binding....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Howard, Emma
Published: University of East Anglia 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.716414
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-716414
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7164142018-10-09T03:29:57ZThe effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agencyHoward, Emma2016The experience of feeling responsible for the outcomes of one's actions is known as the sense of agency. The phenomenon of reduced perceived temporal proximity between actions and their effects is thought to implicitly index the sense of agency, and is known as temporal or intentional binding. The optimal cue integration account indicates that the sense of agency is dependent of the integration of several cues. This thesis uses temporal binding to investigate instances which afford cues that may hinder the generation of agency. Chapters 3 and 4 examine the modulatory roles of physical and mental effort finding that the implicit sense of agency reduced under physical and mental strain. In Chapter 5, electroencephalography was used to investigate the influence of mental effort on neural response to action outcomes. Concordant with previous findings, neural responses to self-generated outcomes were reduced (i.e. attenuated readiness potentials and N1 components), however, the effect of effort was less reliable, providing limited evidence for the role of individual task difficulty on the attenuation of the readiness potential. Chapter 6 found that high levels of (subclinical) schizotypy weakened the sense of agency, whereby temporal binding was less distinguished across conditions of agency and no agency. In Chapter 7, it was shown that the affective content of social stimuli did not modulate temporal binding, nor did individual differences in social anxiety. Overall, these findings support the notion that the sense of agency is dependent on the availability of cognitive resources, and in contexts in which agency cues concurrently deplete these resources, either by physical or mental effort, or in individuals with tendencies to attribute agency inappropriately, agency is weakened. Nevertheless, the lack of modulation by emotional stimuli and by anxiety provide informative boundary conditions for these effects. Beyond contributing to our understanding of this key aspect of human experience, work in this area could influence how society considers responsibility in everyday life and in law, and how aberrant experiences of agency can be understood in disease.616.85University of East Angliahttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.716414https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/63982/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.85
spellingShingle 616.85
Howard, Emma
The effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency
description The experience of feeling responsible for the outcomes of one's actions is known as the sense of agency. The phenomenon of reduced perceived temporal proximity between actions and their effects is thought to implicitly index the sense of agency, and is known as temporal or intentional binding. The optimal cue integration account indicates that the sense of agency is dependent of the integration of several cues. This thesis uses temporal binding to investigate instances which afford cues that may hinder the generation of agency. Chapters 3 and 4 examine the modulatory roles of physical and mental effort finding that the implicit sense of agency reduced under physical and mental strain. In Chapter 5, electroencephalography was used to investigate the influence of mental effort on neural response to action outcomes. Concordant with previous findings, neural responses to self-generated outcomes were reduced (i.e. attenuated readiness potentials and N1 components), however, the effect of effort was less reliable, providing limited evidence for the role of individual task difficulty on the attenuation of the readiness potential. Chapter 6 found that high levels of (subclinical) schizotypy weakened the sense of agency, whereby temporal binding was less distinguished across conditions of agency and no agency. In Chapter 7, it was shown that the affective content of social stimuli did not modulate temporal binding, nor did individual differences in social anxiety. Overall, these findings support the notion that the sense of agency is dependent on the availability of cognitive resources, and in contexts in which agency cues concurrently deplete these resources, either by physical or mental effort, or in individuals with tendencies to attribute agency inappropriately, agency is weakened. Nevertheless, the lack of modulation by emotional stimuli and by anxiety provide informative boundary conditions for these effects. Beyond contributing to our understanding of this key aspect of human experience, work in this area could influence how society considers responsibility in everyday life and in law, and how aberrant experiences of agency can be understood in disease.
author Howard, Emma
author_facet Howard, Emma
author_sort Howard, Emma
title The effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency
title_short The effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency
title_full The effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency
title_fullStr The effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency
title_full_unstemmed The effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency
title_sort effect of effort and individual differences on the implicit sense of agency
publisher University of East Anglia
publishDate 2016
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.716414
work_keys_str_mv AT howardemma theeffectofeffortandindividualdifferencesontheimplicitsenseofagency
AT howardemma effectofeffortandindividualdifferencesontheimplicitsenseofagency
_version_ 1718772776183005184