Moral principles

Words like 'rules', 'principles' and 'laws' show in ordinary usage a considerable degree of fluidity which makes it impossible to draw more than certain broad distinctions between them, and moral philosophers have generally shown a tendency to use these words in rather...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chopra, Yogendra
Published: Royal Holloway, University of London 1960
Subjects:
170
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.703846
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-703846
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-7038462018-06-12T03:46:58ZMoral principlesChopra, Yogendra1960Words like 'rules', 'principles' and 'laws' show in ordinary usage a considerable degree of fluidity which makes it impossible to draw more than certain broad distinctions between them, and moral philosophers have generally shown a tendency to use these words in rather blanket ways which ignore even these broad distinctions. It is necessary therefore to explain at the outset the sense in which 'principles' is used in this enquiry. As used here, this term means certain requirements of a general nature belonging to a given subject-matter which conflict with one another in a systematic way and without indicating a defect in their formulation. This definition is not arbitrarily chosen but is claimed to apply to the main kind of general utterance in the field of morals. At a further stage a moral principle' is defined stipulatively as a principle which contains a distinctive moral concept in its statement as constitutive of its scope, and it is maintained that all moral principles in this sense adduce considerations. The chief antithesis of my position in this enquiry is constituted by what I call formalism, namely the view that moral principles are principles of a universal nature which are treated as the overriding principles of our lives. In rejecting this view I do not opt for what might easily be taken to be the natural alternative to it, i.e. the view that moral principles are the principles of human excellence. The alternative adopted by me is based on the notion of competing fields. By a field I mean a set of standards which apply to our conduct irrespective of our own choices; thus morality, self-interest and religion are fields in my sense. These fields compete with each other both by having border-disputes as well as by threatening one another with complete subjugation. This enquiry is thus in part a plea that a major function of ethics is the study of the various moral concepts and of concepts belonging to other fields which are of importance in understanding the relation between morality and its rivals.170PhilosophyRoyal Holloway, University of Londonhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.703846http://repository.royalholloway.ac.uk/items/8812b9f5-0d5a-4f04-8195-7367ba441799/1/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 170
Philosophy
spellingShingle 170
Philosophy
Chopra, Yogendra
Moral principles
description Words like 'rules', 'principles' and 'laws' show in ordinary usage a considerable degree of fluidity which makes it impossible to draw more than certain broad distinctions between them, and moral philosophers have generally shown a tendency to use these words in rather blanket ways which ignore even these broad distinctions. It is necessary therefore to explain at the outset the sense in which 'principles' is used in this enquiry. As used here, this term means certain requirements of a general nature belonging to a given subject-matter which conflict with one another in a systematic way and without indicating a defect in their formulation. This definition is not arbitrarily chosen but is claimed to apply to the main kind of general utterance in the field of morals. At a further stage a moral principle' is defined stipulatively as a principle which contains a distinctive moral concept in its statement as constitutive of its scope, and it is maintained that all moral principles in this sense adduce considerations. The chief antithesis of my position in this enquiry is constituted by what I call formalism, namely the view that moral principles are principles of a universal nature which are treated as the overriding principles of our lives. In rejecting this view I do not opt for what might easily be taken to be the natural alternative to it, i.e. the view that moral principles are the principles of human excellence. The alternative adopted by me is based on the notion of competing fields. By a field I mean a set of standards which apply to our conduct irrespective of our own choices; thus morality, self-interest and religion are fields in my sense. These fields compete with each other both by having border-disputes as well as by threatening one another with complete subjugation. This enquiry is thus in part a plea that a major function of ethics is the study of the various moral concepts and of concepts belonging to other fields which are of importance in understanding the relation between morality and its rivals.
author Chopra, Yogendra
author_facet Chopra, Yogendra
author_sort Chopra, Yogendra
title Moral principles
title_short Moral principles
title_full Moral principles
title_fullStr Moral principles
title_full_unstemmed Moral principles
title_sort moral principles
publisher Royal Holloway, University of London
publishDate 1960
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.703846
work_keys_str_mv AT choprayogendra moralprinciples
_version_ 1718694697077047296