The royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509

When Ernst Kantorowicz published The King’s Two Bodies in 1957, far greater importance was placed upon the body politic, the office of King, than on the body natural, the king as a man. In part, this thesis sets out to overturn this notion: the royal corpse was the central and most vital element of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duch, Anna Maria
Other Authors: Ormrod, W. M.
Published: University of York 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.693112
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-693112
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6931122018-02-05T15:35:55ZThe royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509Duch, Anna MariaOrmrod, W. M.2016When Ernst Kantorowicz published The King’s Two Bodies in 1957, far greater importance was placed upon the body politic, the office of King, than on the body natural, the king as a man. In part, this thesis sets out to overturn this notion: the royal corpse was the central and most vital element of the royal funerary and burial ceremonies, and concern for the royal body and its soul lasted for centuries. Although the King always lived, the mortal king did not become inert or null upon death. The English royal funeral has been understudied. The practical mechanics of English kings’ funerals (including the preservation of the body, the role of the Church, and the events of the ceremonies) have not been laid out clearly. This thesis seeks to update the analysis of both individual kingly funerals and the overarching development of royal exequies over three centuries, from John in 1216 to Henry VII in 1509. It is my argument that the language used in the royal prescriptive funerary and burial texts permitted individual variation based on personal preferences, the unique circumstances of the death, and the requirements of the Church for a Christian burial. The royal prescriptive texts were elastic, enabling a wide variety of kings during the medieval period to be laid to rest fittingly and honorably, according to their station. These prescriptive texts did not cover commemoration, an omission that allowed flexibility in celebrating the legacy of a deceased king. In special cases, the living elected to rebury the dead, be it for practical reasons or to enhance the legacies of both parties. The ceremonies and the ensuing commemoration, combined with a pronounced preference for burial in England for members of the royal house, formed an English royal way of death.941.03University of Yorkhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.693112http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/13700/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 941.03
spellingShingle 941.03
Duch, Anna Maria
The royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509
description When Ernst Kantorowicz published The King’s Two Bodies in 1957, far greater importance was placed upon the body politic, the office of King, than on the body natural, the king as a man. In part, this thesis sets out to overturn this notion: the royal corpse was the central and most vital element of the royal funerary and burial ceremonies, and concern for the royal body and its soul lasted for centuries. Although the King always lived, the mortal king did not become inert or null upon death. The English royal funeral has been understudied. The practical mechanics of English kings’ funerals (including the preservation of the body, the role of the Church, and the events of the ceremonies) have not been laid out clearly. This thesis seeks to update the analysis of both individual kingly funerals and the overarching development of royal exequies over three centuries, from John in 1216 to Henry VII in 1509. It is my argument that the language used in the royal prescriptive funerary and burial texts permitted individual variation based on personal preferences, the unique circumstances of the death, and the requirements of the Church for a Christian burial. The royal prescriptive texts were elastic, enabling a wide variety of kings during the medieval period to be laid to rest fittingly and honorably, according to their station. These prescriptive texts did not cover commemoration, an omission that allowed flexibility in celebrating the legacy of a deceased king. In special cases, the living elected to rebury the dead, be it for practical reasons or to enhance the legacies of both parties. The ceremonies and the ensuing commemoration, combined with a pronounced preference for burial in England for members of the royal house, formed an English royal way of death.
author2 Ormrod, W. M.
author_facet Ormrod, W. M.
Duch, Anna Maria
author Duch, Anna Maria
author_sort Duch, Anna Maria
title The royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509
title_short The royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509
title_full The royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509
title_fullStr The royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509
title_full_unstemmed The royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval English kings, 1216-1509
title_sort royal funerary and burial ceremonies of medieval english kings, 1216-1509
publisher University of York
publishDate 2016
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.693112
work_keys_str_mv AT duchannamaria theroyalfuneraryandburialceremoniesofmedievalenglishkings12161509
AT duchannamaria royalfuneraryandburialceremoniesofmedievalenglishkings12161509
_version_ 1718613145468010496