Understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans

Environmental food-associated stimuli potentiate feeding in non-human animals and humans. However, there has been no investigation of this phenomena in human adults using novel stimuli which are then selectively associated with food through different learning processes. The aims of this thesis were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ridley-Siegert, Thomas
Published: University of Sussex 2016
Subjects:
153
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.690435
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-690435
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6904352019-03-05T15:21:11ZUnderstanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humansRidley-Siegert, Thomas2016Environmental food-associated stimuli potentiate feeding in non-human animals and humans. However, there has been no investigation of this phenomena in human adults using novel stimuli which are then selectively associated with food through different learning processes. The aims of this thesis were twofold; firstly, to investigate whether Pavlovian cues (those that signal what and when an outcome will occur) and discriminative stimuli (those that signal whether an outcome will occur) which are associated with food will increase subsequent intake. Secondly, to investigate neural activity in response to these stimuli. The first set of studies examined Pavlovian cue-food associations. Study one utilised a new methodology to associate stimuli with specific tastes and demonstrated evidence for cue-potentiated feeding: people ate more in the presence of cues associated with a sweet taste (CS+). This potentiation was greater for foods which were sweet and so constonant with the trained taste. Study two utilised the same methodology but now contrasted sweet likers and sweet-dislikers. However, the cue-potentiation finding failed to replicate. The second set of studies examined cues associated with the chance to obtain food-rewards, interpreted as discriminative stimuli (DS). Study three trained participants to associate stimuli with obtaining food-rewards if the correct response was produced. The findings displayed a suppression of intake in the presence of a stimulus associated with not obtaining rewards compared to a stimulus associated with obtaining chocolate rewards. Study four extended Study three however sated half the participants prior to the intake test. However the previous cue-suppression finding did not replicate. Study five examined how these two different cue-food associations are encoded in the brain using fMRI. Analysis revealed that the stimuli modified activity in neural regions associated with reward, although whereas the DS enhanced striatal activation, the CS+ deactivated the striatum. The evidence for the lack of contingency awareness to affect behaviour throughout the thesis is discussed.153BF0501 MotivationUniversity of Sussexhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.690435http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61136/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 153
BF0501 Motivation
spellingShingle 153
BF0501 Motivation
Ridley-Siegert, Thomas
Understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans
description Environmental food-associated stimuli potentiate feeding in non-human animals and humans. However, there has been no investigation of this phenomena in human adults using novel stimuli which are then selectively associated with food through different learning processes. The aims of this thesis were twofold; firstly, to investigate whether Pavlovian cues (those that signal what and when an outcome will occur) and discriminative stimuli (those that signal whether an outcome will occur) which are associated with food will increase subsequent intake. Secondly, to investigate neural activity in response to these stimuli. The first set of studies examined Pavlovian cue-food associations. Study one utilised a new methodology to associate stimuli with specific tastes and demonstrated evidence for cue-potentiated feeding: people ate more in the presence of cues associated with a sweet taste (CS+). This potentiation was greater for foods which were sweet and so constonant with the trained taste. Study two utilised the same methodology but now contrasted sweet likers and sweet-dislikers. However, the cue-potentiation finding failed to replicate. The second set of studies examined cues associated with the chance to obtain food-rewards, interpreted as discriminative stimuli (DS). Study three trained participants to associate stimuli with obtaining food-rewards if the correct response was produced. The findings displayed a suppression of intake in the presence of a stimulus associated with not obtaining rewards compared to a stimulus associated with obtaining chocolate rewards. Study four extended Study three however sated half the participants prior to the intake test. However the previous cue-suppression finding did not replicate. Study five examined how these two different cue-food associations are encoded in the brain using fMRI. Analysis revealed that the stimuli modified activity in neural regions associated with reward, although whereas the DS enhanced striatal activation, the CS+ deactivated the striatum. The evidence for the lack of contingency awareness to affect behaviour throughout the thesis is discussed.
author Ridley-Siegert, Thomas
author_facet Ridley-Siegert, Thomas
author_sort Ridley-Siegert, Thomas
title Understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans
title_short Understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans
title_full Understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans
title_fullStr Understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans
title_sort understanding the impact of food-associated stimuli on intake in humans
publisher University of Sussex
publishDate 2016
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.690435
work_keys_str_mv AT ridleysiegertthomas understandingtheimpactoffoodassociatedstimulionintakeinhumans
_version_ 1718992026255491072