Are there similarities and differences in the content and process of clinical decision making by Biomedical Engineers, Occupational Therapists and Speech and Language Therapists when assessing for electronic assistive technology for adults with an acquired brain injury?
Electronic assistive technology (EAT) is prescribed by different professionals. Little is known regarding how these professionals make prescription decisions or their perceptions of their specialist knowledge and role in the assessment process. Study Aims: • to explore the participants’ perceptions...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Published: |
King's College London (University of London)
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.684412 |