Constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FE
This doctoral study draws upon interviews with nine curriculum-based FE college middle-managers, and three college strategic plan documents, to critically analyse middle-management identity. Through the use of an analytical framework based on Foucault’s archaeological and genealogical ‘method’ the s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
University of Manchester
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.679987 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-679987 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6799872017-08-30T03:15:04ZConstituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FEFort, Anthony2015This doctoral study draws upon interviews with nine curriculum-based FE college middle-managers, and three college strategic plan documents, to critically analyse middle-management identity. Through the use of an analytical framework based on Foucault’s archaeological and genealogical ‘method’ the study shows that when middle-managers talk about their professional practice they are preoccupied with data-metrics. Consequently, they are recognised as ‘disciplined subjects’; disciplined by those data-metrics materially inscribed within the discursive regimes of their college strategic plan documents. The study additionally indicates that the more hierarchically senior the middle-manager the greater the intensity of focus upon data-metrics at the expense of institutional social relations, whereby their preoccupations with data-metrics yield de-socialising effects between themselves and key institutional participants such as teachers, learners and support staff. The study further suggests that while the middle-managers within this study were curriculum-based they were not curriculum-focused; findings which were consistent through the range of middle-management levels: senior-middle, lower-middle and middle-middle, and at separate college sites. Considered together these findings raise a number of important questions for the crucial role of curriculum-based middle-managers, particularly where middle-management as a function is recognised as the means by which policy implementation is secured yet where curriculum-based work, when understood as necessarily tied to pedagogic practices, requires a focus around ‘the learner’; a learner not ontologically foregrounded as data, but in authentically social terms.378.1Middle-management FE FoucaultUniversity of Manchesterhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.679987https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/constituting-the-managerial-subject-an-investigation-into-middlemanagement-in-fe(56f98fc6-c3f0-4b98-a692-117efb6775e8).htmlElectronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
378.1 Middle-management FE Foucault |
spellingShingle |
378.1 Middle-management FE Foucault Fort, Anthony Constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FE |
description |
This doctoral study draws upon interviews with nine curriculum-based FE college middle-managers, and three college strategic plan documents, to critically analyse middle-management identity. Through the use of an analytical framework based on Foucault’s archaeological and genealogical ‘method’ the study shows that when middle-managers talk about their professional practice they are preoccupied with data-metrics. Consequently, they are recognised as ‘disciplined subjects’; disciplined by those data-metrics materially inscribed within the discursive regimes of their college strategic plan documents. The study additionally indicates that the more hierarchically senior the middle-manager the greater the intensity of focus upon data-metrics at the expense of institutional social relations, whereby their preoccupations with data-metrics yield de-socialising effects between themselves and key institutional participants such as teachers, learners and support staff. The study further suggests that while the middle-managers within this study were curriculum-based they were not curriculum-focused; findings which were consistent through the range of middle-management levels: senior-middle, lower-middle and middle-middle, and at separate college sites. Considered together these findings raise a number of important questions for the crucial role of curriculum-based middle-managers, particularly where middle-management as a function is recognised as the means by which policy implementation is secured yet where curriculum-based work, when understood as necessarily tied to pedagogic practices, requires a focus around ‘the learner’; a learner not ontologically foregrounded as data, but in authentically social terms. |
author |
Fort, Anthony |
author_facet |
Fort, Anthony |
author_sort |
Fort, Anthony |
title |
Constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FE |
title_short |
Constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FE |
title_full |
Constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FE |
title_fullStr |
Constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FE |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in FE |
title_sort |
constituting the managerial subject : an investigation into middle-management in fe |
publisher |
University of Manchester |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.679987 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fortanthony constitutingthemanagerialsubjectaninvestigationintomiddlemanagementinfe |
_version_ |
1718520965561843712 |