Antitrust : the person-centred approach

This thesis proposes a different approach to theorising, analysing and expounding antitrust issues. It states that at present, antitrust is addressed from top-down and narrow perspectives which in effect limit or exclude issues that could otherwise be addressed as antitrust-related especially where...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Al-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi
Published: Swansea University 2012
Subjects:
340
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.678310
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-678310
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6783102018-09-25T03:25:23ZAntitrust : the person-centred approachAl-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi2012This thesis proposes a different approach to theorising, analysing and expounding antitrust issues. It states that at present, antitrust is addressed from top-down and narrow perspectives which in effect limit or exclude issues that could otherwise be addressed as antitrust-related especially where antitrust concepts are understood and applied from a broader perspective. The justification for seeking inclusiveness is premised on the concept of procedural justice and on the democratisation of ideas. The thesis commences from a deconstructionist standpoint in order to show the weakness of top-down accounts. It is shown that the prevailing and dominant antitrust accounts cannot lay exclusive claim to antitrust. This is proved by establishing the deconstructability of such individual theories by making due reference to the position of "the Other". The failure to give adequate countenance to the position of "the Other" means that this theories will likely fail to be inclusive. Thus, with the aim of correcting the problem of exclusion attributed to top-down accounts, the thesis identifies the need to construct a bottom-up account. As a precondition, the thesis recognises that any such bottom-up account must avoid making ex ante judgments about the suitability or otherwise of the normative contents of antitrust laws and theories. Taking this condition into account, two alternative approaches based on pure procedural justice are outlined - Habermas' Discourse Ethics and the person-centred approach. The former is shown to be incapable of practical application. This makes it imperative to thoroughly substantiate the latter. The person-centred analysis showcases the conceptual value of inclusiveness by assessing antitrust law and policy through the position of the parties involved. The conceptual value of inclusiveness is also showcased from the policy perspective through the capability approach. This account also shows the value of inclusiveness to antitrust enforcement. It however falls short in terms of adjudicatory value particularly in terms of its practical application. The practical shortfall notwithstanding, this thesis concludes by emphasising how the idea behind the person-centred approach could potentially enrich antitrust discourse and also guide policy-makers and enforcers.340Antitrust lawSwansea University https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.678310https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42765Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 340
Antitrust law
spellingShingle 340
Antitrust law
Al-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi
Antitrust : the person-centred approach
description This thesis proposes a different approach to theorising, analysing and expounding antitrust issues. It states that at present, antitrust is addressed from top-down and narrow perspectives which in effect limit or exclude issues that could otherwise be addressed as antitrust-related especially where antitrust concepts are understood and applied from a broader perspective. The justification for seeking inclusiveness is premised on the concept of procedural justice and on the democratisation of ideas. The thesis commences from a deconstructionist standpoint in order to show the weakness of top-down accounts. It is shown that the prevailing and dominant antitrust accounts cannot lay exclusive claim to antitrust. This is proved by establishing the deconstructability of such individual theories by making due reference to the position of "the Other". The failure to give adequate countenance to the position of "the Other" means that this theories will likely fail to be inclusive. Thus, with the aim of correcting the problem of exclusion attributed to top-down accounts, the thesis identifies the need to construct a bottom-up account. As a precondition, the thesis recognises that any such bottom-up account must avoid making ex ante judgments about the suitability or otherwise of the normative contents of antitrust laws and theories. Taking this condition into account, two alternative approaches based on pure procedural justice are outlined - Habermas' Discourse Ethics and the person-centred approach. The former is shown to be incapable of practical application. This makes it imperative to thoroughly substantiate the latter. The person-centred analysis showcases the conceptual value of inclusiveness by assessing antitrust law and policy through the position of the parties involved. The conceptual value of inclusiveness is also showcased from the policy perspective through the capability approach. This account also shows the value of inclusiveness to antitrust enforcement. It however falls short in terms of adjudicatory value particularly in terms of its practical application. The practical shortfall notwithstanding, this thesis concludes by emphasising how the idea behind the person-centred approach could potentially enrich antitrust discourse and also guide policy-makers and enforcers.
author Al-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi
author_facet Al-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi
author_sort Al-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi
title Antitrust : the person-centred approach
title_short Antitrust : the person-centred approach
title_full Antitrust : the person-centred approach
title_fullStr Antitrust : the person-centred approach
title_full_unstemmed Antitrust : the person-centred approach
title_sort antitrust : the person-centred approach
publisher Swansea University
publishDate 2012
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.678310
work_keys_str_mv AT alameenhammeedabayomi antitrustthepersoncentredapproach
_version_ 1718742285149011968