Language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms
This thesis inquires into how human language relates to morality – and shows the ways language enables, extends, and maintains human value systems. Though we ultimately need to view the relation between language and morality from many different perspectives – biological, psychological, sociological,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
University of Edinburgh
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.660710 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-660710 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6607102017-12-24T15:19:03ZLanguage and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanismsPoulshock, Joseph W.2006This thesis inquires into how human language relates to morality – and shows the ways language enables, extends, and maintains human value systems. Though we ultimately need to view the relation between language and morality from many different perspectives – biological, psychological, sociological, and philosophical – the approach here is primarily a linguistic one informed by evolutionary theory. At first, this study shows how natural selection relates to the problem of altruism and how language serves human moral ontogeny. Subsequently, the argument demonstrates how language helps enable cultural group selection. Moreover, as language helps influence human behaviour in an altruistic direction beyond in-group non-kin (helping facilitate cultural group selection), we also consider how language can help facilitate altruistic behaviour towards out-group non-kin. This therefore raises the prospect of a limited moral realism in a world of evolutionary processes. With these issues and possibilities in mind, we consider and analyze the properties of language that help extend human morality. Specifically, discussion covers how recursion, linguistic creativity, naming ability, displacement, stimulus freedom, compositionality, cultural transmission, and categorization extend moral systems. Moreover, because language so broadly influences morality, the inquiry extends into how linguistic differences (specifically between English and Japanese) might also cause subtle differences in moral perception between Japanese and English speakers. Lastly, we consider how moral ideas might take on a life of their own, catalytically propagating in degrees dependent and independent of human intention.410University of Edinburghhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.660710http://hdl.handle.net/1842/25094Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
410 |
spellingShingle |
410 Poulshock, Joseph W. Language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms |
description |
This thesis inquires into how human language relates to morality – and shows the ways language enables, extends, and maintains human value systems. Though we ultimately need to view the relation between language and morality from many different perspectives – biological, psychological, sociological, and philosophical – the approach here is primarily a linguistic one informed by evolutionary theory. At first, this study shows how natural selection relates to the problem of altruism and how language serves human moral ontogeny. Subsequently, the argument demonstrates how language helps enable cultural group selection. Moreover, as language helps influence human behaviour in an altruistic direction beyond in-group non-kin (helping facilitate cultural group selection), we also consider how language can help facilitate altruistic behaviour towards out-group non-kin. This therefore raises the prospect of a limited moral realism in a world of evolutionary processes. With these issues and possibilities in mind, we consider and analyze the properties of language that help extend human morality. Specifically, discussion covers how recursion, linguistic creativity, naming ability, displacement, stimulus freedom, compositionality, cultural transmission, and categorization extend moral systems. Moreover, because language so broadly influences morality, the inquiry extends into how linguistic differences (specifically between English and Japanese) might also cause subtle differences in moral perception between Japanese and English speakers. Lastly, we consider how moral ideas might take on a life of their own, catalytically propagating in degrees dependent and independent of human intention. |
author |
Poulshock, Joseph W. |
author_facet |
Poulshock, Joseph W. |
author_sort |
Poulshock, Joseph W. |
title |
Language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms |
title_short |
Language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms |
title_full |
Language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms |
title_fullStr |
Language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
Language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms |
title_sort |
language and morality : evolution, altruism, and linguistic moral mechanisms |
publisher |
University of Edinburgh |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.660710 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT poulshockjosephw languageandmoralityevolutionaltruismandlinguisticmoralmechanisms |
_version_ |
1718567228567191552 |