Adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance

The goal of the Ph.D. research was to develop an empirical foundation suitable for designing educational interventions and programmes aiming to improve students' learning. In order to achieve this a series of studies was conducted that supported the development and test of a comprehensive, chai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rogaten, Jekaterina
Published: London Metropolitan University 2014
Subjects:
370
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658046
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-658046
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6580462017-10-04T03:23:20ZAdaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performanceRogaten, Jekaterina2014The goal of the Ph.D. research was to develop an empirical foundation suitable for designing educational interventions and programmes aiming to improve students' learning. In order to achieve this a series of studies was conducted that supported the development and test of a comprehensive, chained mediation model of academic performance. The proposed chained mediation model comprised of adaptive-positive and maladaptive-negative submodels. The adaptive-positive submodel hypothesised firstly that trait intrinsic motivation and adaptive metacognition would facilitate the use of creative cognition in studying (first-level mediator). Secondly, the mediator hypothesised that the use of creative cognition in studying would lead to the experience of positive affect in studying, and to the development of adaptive approaches to studying (second-level mediators). Finally, the submodel hypothesised that positive affect in studying and adaptive approaches to studying would facilitate academic performance. The maladaptive-negative submodel hypothesised firstly that trait intrinsic motivation and maladaptive metacognition would lead to evaluation anxiety (first-level mediator). Secondly, the model hypothesised that evaluation anxiety would lead to the experience of negative affect in studying, and to the development of a maladaptive approach to studying (second-level mediators). Finally, the model hypothesised that negative affect in studying and the maladaptive approach to studying would undermine academic performance. A total of five studies were conducted employing 2140 university students.370370 EducationLondon Metropolitan Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658046http://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/694/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 370
370 Education
spellingShingle 370
370 Education
Rogaten, Jekaterina
Adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance
description The goal of the Ph.D. research was to develop an empirical foundation suitable for designing educational interventions and programmes aiming to improve students' learning. In order to achieve this a series of studies was conducted that supported the development and test of a comprehensive, chained mediation model of academic performance. The proposed chained mediation model comprised of adaptive-positive and maladaptive-negative submodels. The adaptive-positive submodel hypothesised firstly that trait intrinsic motivation and adaptive metacognition would facilitate the use of creative cognition in studying (first-level mediator). Secondly, the mediator hypothesised that the use of creative cognition in studying would lead to the experience of positive affect in studying, and to the development of adaptive approaches to studying (second-level mediators). Finally, the submodel hypothesised that positive affect in studying and adaptive approaches to studying would facilitate academic performance. The maladaptive-negative submodel hypothesised firstly that trait intrinsic motivation and maladaptive metacognition would lead to evaluation anxiety (first-level mediator). Secondly, the model hypothesised that evaluation anxiety would lead to the experience of negative affect in studying, and to the development of a maladaptive approach to studying (second-level mediators). Finally, the model hypothesised that negative affect in studying and the maladaptive approach to studying would undermine academic performance. A total of five studies were conducted employing 2140 university students.
author Rogaten, Jekaterina
author_facet Rogaten, Jekaterina
author_sort Rogaten, Jekaterina
title Adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance
title_short Adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance
title_full Adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance
title_fullStr Adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance
title_sort adaptive-positive vs. maladaptive-negative structures and processes in learning : towards the comprehensive model of academic performance
publisher London Metropolitan University
publishDate 2014
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.658046
work_keys_str_mv AT rogatenjekaterina adaptivepositivevsmaladaptivenegativestructuresandprocessesinlearningtowardsthecomprehensivemodelofacademicperformance
_version_ 1718543780281319424