Transcendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray

This thesis examines what I term 'transcendental kinship' in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray. This may be defined as the attitude of one who tries to surpass everyday embodied reality in an effort to relate to spiritual or mental others. The first chapter examines the anthropolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Miller, Gavin Harrison MacKenzie
Published: University of Edinburgh 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.657801
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-657801
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6578012017-08-30T03:12:36ZTranscendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair GrayMiller, Gavin Harrison MacKenzie2000This thesis examines what I term 'transcendental kinship' in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray. This may be defined as the attitude of one who tries to surpass everyday embodied reality in an effort to relate to spiritual or mental others. The first chapter examines the anthropological notion of kinship and its relevance to Friel's short stories. There we discover how personal identities are formed within networks of mutual recognition, and how even the relationship of worshipper to deity is modelled after this pattern. In the second chapter, we see how Friel's alienated protagonists attempt to relate to a higher world - a kinship which they suppose to be revealed in providential patterns of co-incidence. This chapter also develops the notion of recognition in its second sense as that process by which one receives confirmation or disconfirmation of one's self-conception. This kind of recognition is the theme of my third chapter. Gray's protagonists are inculcated with a sense of guilt by the recognitive responses of their community. It is for this reason that they develop a compensatory personal religion in which a higher power approves of and validates their spontaneous inclinations. Only a return, however, to everyday relations of trust can undo the pathological side-effects of this transcendental kinship. My fourth chapter transfers my analysis to the act of reading itself. For Friel and for Gray, the novel is traditionally a way by which the reader is allowed to feel that he or she has glimpsed a world of greater reality than the everyday phenomenal scene. Consequently, both these authors develop innovative narrative techniques in order to challenge this complicity with the reader's own alienation from recognitive relations. I conclude my thesis with a chapter which analyses and integrates the specifically Scottish philosophical context which informs these motifs of transcendental kinship in the work of Friel and Gray.820.90091University of Edinburghhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.657801http://hdl.handle.net/1842/22493Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 820.90091
spellingShingle 820.90091
Miller, Gavin Harrison MacKenzie
Transcendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray
description This thesis examines what I term 'transcendental kinship' in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray. This may be defined as the attitude of one who tries to surpass everyday embodied reality in an effort to relate to spiritual or mental others. The first chapter examines the anthropological notion of kinship and its relevance to Friel's short stories. There we discover how personal identities are formed within networks of mutual recognition, and how even the relationship of worshipper to deity is modelled after this pattern. In the second chapter, we see how Friel's alienated protagonists attempt to relate to a higher world - a kinship which they suppose to be revealed in providential patterns of co-incidence. This chapter also develops the notion of recognition in its second sense as that process by which one receives confirmation or disconfirmation of one's self-conception. This kind of recognition is the theme of my third chapter. Gray's protagonists are inculcated with a sense of guilt by the recognitive responses of their community. It is for this reason that they develop a compensatory personal religion in which a higher power approves of and validates their spontaneous inclinations. Only a return, however, to everyday relations of trust can undo the pathological side-effects of this transcendental kinship. My fourth chapter transfers my analysis to the act of reading itself. For Friel and for Gray, the novel is traditionally a way by which the reader is allowed to feel that he or she has glimpsed a world of greater reality than the everyday phenomenal scene. Consequently, both these authors develop innovative narrative techniques in order to challenge this complicity with the reader's own alienation from recognitive relations. I conclude my thesis with a chapter which analyses and integrates the specifically Scottish philosophical context which informs these motifs of transcendental kinship in the work of Friel and Gray.
author Miller, Gavin Harrison MacKenzie
author_facet Miller, Gavin Harrison MacKenzie
author_sort Miller, Gavin Harrison MacKenzie
title Transcendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray
title_short Transcendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray
title_full Transcendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray
title_fullStr Transcendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray
title_full_unstemmed Transcendental kinship in the work of George Friel and Alasdair Gray
title_sort transcendental kinship in the work of george friel and alasdair gray
publisher University of Edinburgh
publishDate 2000
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.657801
work_keys_str_mv AT millergavinharrisonmackenzie transcendentalkinshipintheworkofgeorgefrielandalasdairgray
_version_ 1718520747970789376