Animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African art

This thesis examines how the language of species pressures the construction of ‘the human’ in post-apartheid democracy in selected recent works by South African artists Nandipha Mntambo, Jane Alexander, Elizabeth Gunter and Steven Cohen. It responds to Achille Mbembe’s call for a “self-writing” that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lipschitz, Ruth Adele
Published: Goldsmiths College (University of London) 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.656272
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-656272
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6562722018-07-18T03:12:35ZAnimality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African artLipschitz, Ruth Adele2015This thesis examines how the language of species pressures the construction of ‘the human’ in post-apartheid democracy in selected recent works by South African artists Nandipha Mntambo, Jane Alexander, Elizabeth Gunter and Steven Cohen. It responds to Achille Mbembe’s call for a “self-writing” that not only answers the historical and contemporary violence of animalisation, but opens onto an “ethics of mutuality.” However, while Mbembe’s “self-writing” criticises the Western model of the subject, it does not disturb what Jacques Derrida describes as its “sacrificial” or “carno-phallogocentric” structure. My argument explores the ways in which these artworks trouble this structure through the ambiguous return of its constitutive sites of exclusion. The theoretical framework is informed by Derrida’s “metonymy of ‘eating well,’” Mbembe’s critique of necropolitical violence, Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection and Donna Haraway’s readings of inappropriate/d, interspecies relationality. The argument foregrounds the limitrophic complication of the political, psychoanalytic and ethical limits between self and other, human and nonhuman, edible and inedible bodies, and literal and figurative ingestions. In so doing, it marks alterity as the opening to a non-anthropocentric and relational subjectivity. Chapter one deals with Mntambo’s re-articulation of black woman-human-animal and introduces the figure of the inappropriate/d subject as heterogeneous at the origin. Chapter two analyses the foreigner-as-animal in Jane Alexander’s uncanny animot and explores the hauntological and non-ethical opening to ethics that inhabits the constitutive violence of ‘eating well.’ Chapter three examines two drawings by Elizabeth Gunter and considers the how we touch the dead and are touched by them. Framing the thesis is a discussion of Steven Cohen’s performance piece, Dance with Nothing but Heart, which is used to position both the sacrificial logic of the subject as well as an ethics of mourning that writes the self-in-relation as the trace of the inappropriate/d.704.9Goldsmiths College (University of London)10.25602/GOLD.00011759http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.656272http://research.gold.ac.uk/11759/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 704.9
spellingShingle 704.9
Lipschitz, Ruth Adele
Animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African art
description This thesis examines how the language of species pressures the construction of ‘the human’ in post-apartheid democracy in selected recent works by South African artists Nandipha Mntambo, Jane Alexander, Elizabeth Gunter and Steven Cohen. It responds to Achille Mbembe’s call for a “self-writing” that not only answers the historical and contemporary violence of animalisation, but opens onto an “ethics of mutuality.” However, while Mbembe’s “self-writing” criticises the Western model of the subject, it does not disturb what Jacques Derrida describes as its “sacrificial” or “carno-phallogocentric” structure. My argument explores the ways in which these artworks trouble this structure through the ambiguous return of its constitutive sites of exclusion. The theoretical framework is informed by Derrida’s “metonymy of ‘eating well,’” Mbembe’s critique of necropolitical violence, Julia Kristeva’s theory of abjection and Donna Haraway’s readings of inappropriate/d, interspecies relationality. The argument foregrounds the limitrophic complication of the political, psychoanalytic and ethical limits between self and other, human and nonhuman, edible and inedible bodies, and literal and figurative ingestions. In so doing, it marks alterity as the opening to a non-anthropocentric and relational subjectivity. Chapter one deals with Mntambo’s re-articulation of black woman-human-animal and introduces the figure of the inappropriate/d subject as heterogeneous at the origin. Chapter two analyses the foreigner-as-animal in Jane Alexander’s uncanny animot and explores the hauntological and non-ethical opening to ethics that inhabits the constitutive violence of ‘eating well.’ Chapter three examines two drawings by Elizabeth Gunter and considers the how we touch the dead and are touched by them. Framing the thesis is a discussion of Steven Cohen’s performance piece, Dance with Nothing but Heart, which is used to position both the sacrificial logic of the subject as well as an ethics of mourning that writes the self-in-relation as the trace of the inappropriate/d.
author Lipschitz, Ruth Adele
author_facet Lipschitz, Ruth Adele
author_sort Lipschitz, Ruth Adele
title Animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African art
title_short Animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African art
title_full Animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African art
title_fullStr Animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African art
title_full_unstemmed Animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary South African art
title_sort animality and alterity : species discourse and the limits of 'the human' in contemporary south african art
publisher Goldsmiths College (University of London)
publishDate 2015
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.656272
work_keys_str_mv AT lipschitzruthadele animalityandalterityspeciesdiscourseandthelimitsofthehumanincontemporarysouthafricanart
_version_ 1718712482101460992