Evolution of the social contract

Humans act to bring about ends that are individually beneficial. Within groups, we also act concertedly to bring about ends that are beneficial to the group. From an evolutionary perspective, there is a tension between these two forces, because, more often than not, what is good for the individual i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taylor, Daniel
Other Authors: Bryson, Joanna
Published: University of Bath 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.642030
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-642030
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6420302019-03-14T03:27:19ZEvolution of the social contractTaylor, DanielBryson, Joanna2014Humans act to bring about ends that are individually beneficial. Within groups, we also act concertedly to bring about ends that are beneficial to the group. From an evolutionary perspective, there is a tension between these two forces, because, more often than not, what is good for the individual is bad for the group, and what is good for the group is bad for the individual. In this dissertation, I argue that in order to resolve this tension between individual and group good, humans have evolved to utilise social contracts - sets of rules that structure interactions within our societies. These contracts, I argue, emerged in our hunter-gatherer ancestry as a means of solving problems surrounding their most basic and most important economic activity - food sharing. Once we became adapted to forming social contracts, we used them to solve increasingly complex social problems, leading, eventually, to our modern day economic organisation.006.3University of Bathhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.642030Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 006.3
spellingShingle 006.3
Taylor, Daniel
Evolution of the social contract
description Humans act to bring about ends that are individually beneficial. Within groups, we also act concertedly to bring about ends that are beneficial to the group. From an evolutionary perspective, there is a tension between these two forces, because, more often than not, what is good for the individual is bad for the group, and what is good for the group is bad for the individual. In this dissertation, I argue that in order to resolve this tension between individual and group good, humans have evolved to utilise social contracts - sets of rules that structure interactions within our societies. These contracts, I argue, emerged in our hunter-gatherer ancestry as a means of solving problems surrounding their most basic and most important economic activity - food sharing. Once we became adapted to forming social contracts, we used them to solve increasingly complex social problems, leading, eventually, to our modern day economic organisation.
author2 Bryson, Joanna
author_facet Bryson, Joanna
Taylor, Daniel
author Taylor, Daniel
author_sort Taylor, Daniel
title Evolution of the social contract
title_short Evolution of the social contract
title_full Evolution of the social contract
title_fullStr Evolution of the social contract
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of the social contract
title_sort evolution of the social contract
publisher University of Bath
publishDate 2014
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.642030
work_keys_str_mv AT taylordaniel evolutionofthesocialcontract
_version_ 1719002555459043328