The elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank Wedekind
This work demonstrates that Frank Wedekind was preoccupied with Christianity and the search for transcendence, a fact that has been largely overlooked by Wedekind research to date. Using hitherto little-known material (his unpublished notebooks) and close readings of his works, both major and minor,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
Swansea University
1996
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.636582 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-636582 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6365822015-03-20T05:32:21ZThe elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank WedekindWhalley, F. A.1996This work demonstrates that Frank Wedekind was preoccupied with Christianity and the search for transcendence, a fact that has been largely overlooked by Wedekind research to date. Using hitherto little-known material (his unpublished notebooks) and close readings of his works, both major and minor, I argue that Wedekind was engaged on a quest to discover the role and purpose of religion in a post-Nietzschean world. His first plays reject conventional beliefs and yet themselves display elements of the search for transcendent value. The Lulu-plays explore the possibility that sexual liberation might provide an answer, but conclude the opposite; <I>Der Marquis von Keith </I>considers whether it is possible or worthwhile to believe in Christianity without God. In <I>Hidalla, </I>Wedekind portrays a Christ-figure for the <I>Wilhelmine </I>era, whose gospel of a new sexual morality is deeply flawed. In this Christ-figure, Karl Hetmann, Wedekind also places elements of himself and this becomes a characteristic of his later plays, in which successive not-quiteWedekind characters seek their own form of transcendence and fail: Buridan, for example, the protagonist of <I>Die Zensur, </I>extols reason but ultimately capitulates to the God of mere superstition. In his last plays, Wedekind presents further versions of himself in Messianic characters who are involved in a cycle of quest and failure within an artistic realm. This suggests that he sees his role as that of martyr to an uncomprehending society: his plays become secular rituals, in which the suffering artist is the redeeming sacrifice necessary for ordinary, bourgeois life to continue; but the impossibility of finding transcendence in any of the strategies developed by his protagonists means he is doomed to repeat the same cycle over and over again.830Swansea University http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.636582Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
830 |
spellingShingle |
830 Whalley, F. A. The elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank Wedekind |
description |
This work demonstrates that Frank Wedekind was preoccupied with Christianity and the search for transcendence, a fact that has been largely overlooked by Wedekind research to date. Using hitherto little-known material (his unpublished notebooks) and close readings of his works, both major and minor, I argue that Wedekind was engaged on a quest to discover the role and purpose of religion in a post-Nietzschean world. His first plays reject conventional beliefs and yet themselves display elements of the search for transcendent value. The Lulu-plays explore the possibility that sexual liberation might provide an answer, but conclude the opposite; <I>Der Marquis von Keith </I>considers whether it is possible or worthwhile to believe in Christianity without God. In <I>Hidalla, </I>Wedekind portrays a Christ-figure for the <I>Wilhelmine </I>era, whose gospel of a new sexual morality is deeply flawed. In this Christ-figure, Karl Hetmann, Wedekind also places elements of himself and this becomes a characteristic of his later plays, in which successive not-quiteWedekind characters seek their own form of transcendence and fail: Buridan, for example, the protagonist of <I>Die Zensur, </I>extols reason but ultimately capitulates to the God of mere superstition. In his last plays, Wedekind presents further versions of himself in Messianic characters who are involved in a cycle of quest and failure within an artistic realm. This suggests that he sees his role as that of martyr to an uncomprehending society: his plays become secular rituals, in which the suffering artist is the redeeming sacrifice necessary for ordinary, bourgeois life to continue; but the impossibility of finding transcendence in any of the strategies developed by his protagonists means he is doomed to repeat the same cycle over and over again. |
author |
Whalley, F. A. |
author_facet |
Whalley, F. A. |
author_sort |
Whalley, F. A. |
title |
The elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank Wedekind |
title_short |
The elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank Wedekind |
title_full |
The elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank Wedekind |
title_fullStr |
The elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank Wedekind |
title_full_unstemmed |
The elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of Frank Wedekind |
title_sort |
elusive transcendent : the role of religion in the plays of frank wedekind |
publisher |
Swansea University |
publishDate |
1996 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.636582 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT whalleyfa theelusivetranscendenttheroleofreligionintheplaysoffrankwedekind AT whalleyfa elusivetranscendenttheroleofreligionintheplaysoffrankwedekind |
_version_ |
1716792390477414400 |