An investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit

The ability of physiotherapists to make clinical decisions is understood to be a vital component of achieving expertise and is part of being an autonomous practitioner, yet this complex phenomenon has been under-researched in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy. Educators in this field need to understan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thackray, Debbie
Other Authors: Fuller, Alison ; Roberts, Lisa ; Nind, Melanie
Published: University of Southampton 2014
Subjects:
370
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.628701
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-628701
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6287012018-09-05T03:25:18ZAn investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unitThackray, DebbieFuller, Alison ; Roberts, Lisa ; Nind, Melanie2014The ability of physiotherapists to make clinical decisions is understood to be a vital component of achieving expertise and is part of being an autonomous practitioner, yet this complex phenomenon has been under-researched in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy. Educators in this field need to understand what method of clinical reasoning clinicians are using, so that educational strategies can be designed to facilitate the development of clinical reasoning by undergraduate physiotherapy students prior to them going on clinical placement. This study explored the clinical reasoning of eight expert cardiorespiratory physiotherapists by observing their actions and behaviour whilst they assessed a simulated patient with respiratory complications in a simulated environment. The assessments were video-recorded. The physiotherapists were encouraged to think-aloud to verbalise their thought processes and had a debrief interview afterwards. The videos and the verbal transcripts from the assessment were analysed using a framework analysis and compared to other models of clinical reasoning. The study has confirmed that clinical reasoning is a complex, multi-dimensional phenomenon and the model produced shares some similarities with other models of clinical reasoning. Four key concepts have been identified as requirements for clinical reasoning development: knowledge acquisition; knowledge storage and retrieval; information processing and cognitive skill development; and metacognition and reflection. These concepts have been incorporated into a new conceptual model of clinical reasoning and embedded into a simulation learning strategy to facilitate clinical reasoning across all three years of the undergraduate physiotherapy programme.370RD SurgeryUniversity of Southamptonhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.628701https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/366487/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 370
RD Surgery
spellingShingle 370
RD Surgery
Thackray, Debbie
An investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit
description The ability of physiotherapists to make clinical decisions is understood to be a vital component of achieving expertise and is part of being an autonomous practitioner, yet this complex phenomenon has been under-researched in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy. Educators in this field need to understand what method of clinical reasoning clinicians are using, so that educational strategies can be designed to facilitate the development of clinical reasoning by undergraduate physiotherapy students prior to them going on clinical placement. This study explored the clinical reasoning of eight expert cardiorespiratory physiotherapists by observing their actions and behaviour whilst they assessed a simulated patient with respiratory complications in a simulated environment. The assessments were video-recorded. The physiotherapists were encouraged to think-aloud to verbalise their thought processes and had a debrief interview afterwards. The videos and the verbal transcripts from the assessment were analysed using a framework analysis and compared to other models of clinical reasoning. The study has confirmed that clinical reasoning is a complex, multi-dimensional phenomenon and the model produced shares some similarities with other models of clinical reasoning. Four key concepts have been identified as requirements for clinical reasoning development: knowledge acquisition; knowledge storage and retrieval; information processing and cognitive skill development; and metacognition and reflection. These concepts have been incorporated into a new conceptual model of clinical reasoning and embedded into a simulation learning strategy to facilitate clinical reasoning across all three years of the undergraduate physiotherapy programme.
author2 Fuller, Alison ; Roberts, Lisa ; Nind, Melanie
author_facet Fuller, Alison ; Roberts, Lisa ; Nind, Melanie
Thackray, Debbie
author Thackray, Debbie
author_sort Thackray, Debbie
title An investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit
title_short An investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit
title_full An investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit
title_fullStr An investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit
title_full_unstemmed An investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit
title_sort investigation into the clinical reasoning of cardiorespiratory physiotherapists using a simulated patient and simulated high dependency unit
publisher University of Southampton
publishDate 2014
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.628701
work_keys_str_mv AT thackraydebbie aninvestigationintotheclinicalreasoningofcardiorespiratoryphysiotherapistsusingasimulatedpatientandsimulatedhighdependencyunit
AT thackraydebbie investigationintotheclinicalreasoningofcardiorespiratoryphysiotherapistsusingasimulatedpatientandsimulatedhighdependencyunit
_version_ 1718729263817949184