Reversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming

Genomic imprinting directs the allele‐specific expression of a subset of loci according to their parental origin. Monoallelic expression of these genes is regulated by imprinting control regions (ICRs) and is established in the embryonic germ line through differential DNA methylation. Differentiated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Piccolo, Francesco M.
Other Authors: Fisher, Amanda
Published: Imperial College London 2013
Subjects:
610
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.616802
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-616802
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6168022017-06-27T03:23:32ZReversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogrammingPiccolo, Francesco M.Fisher, Amanda2013Genomic imprinting directs the allele‐specific expression of a subset of loci according to their parental origin. Monoallelic expression of these genes is regulated by imprinting control regions (ICRs) and is established in the embryonic germ line through differential DNA methylation. Differentiated cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency by several strategies including the ectopic expression of specific ‘inducers’ and by transfer of nuclei into enucleated eggs. Cellular fusion of somatic cells with a pluripotent stem cell partner can also lead to dominant pluripotent reprogramming. Although ES cells (derived from the inner cell mass) and embryonic germ cells (EG, derived from primordial germ cells) can both reprogram, EG cells are unique in being able to erase genomic imprints from the somatic partner. In order to characterize the earliest events in successful reprogramming, as well as EG‐specific DNA demethylation, I generated experimental heterokaryons between B‐lymphocytes and mouse stem cell lines. I showed that ES cells that lack Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 (PRC2) failed to reprogram B cells and were unable to induce two early events that characterise successful B cell reprogramming; a global redistribution of HP1α and an increased serine 10 phosphorylation. In the second part of my study I confirmed that EG cells were able to induce DNA demethylation at several ICR in B cells following fusion. I present evidence that this reprogramming of the somatic genome requires Tet1 and Tet2 and is accomplished through a two‐step process involving both DNA synthesis and conversion of 5methylcytosine into 5hydroxymethylcytosine.610Imperial College Londonhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.616802http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/14505Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 610
spellingShingle 610
Piccolo, Francesco M.
Reversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming
description Genomic imprinting directs the allele‐specific expression of a subset of loci according to their parental origin. Monoallelic expression of these genes is regulated by imprinting control regions (ICRs) and is established in the embryonic germ line through differential DNA methylation. Differentiated cells can be reprogrammed to pluripotency by several strategies including the ectopic expression of specific ‘inducers’ and by transfer of nuclei into enucleated eggs. Cellular fusion of somatic cells with a pluripotent stem cell partner can also lead to dominant pluripotent reprogramming. Although ES cells (derived from the inner cell mass) and embryonic germ cells (EG, derived from primordial germ cells) can both reprogram, EG cells are unique in being able to erase genomic imprints from the somatic partner. In order to characterize the earliest events in successful reprogramming, as well as EG‐specific DNA demethylation, I generated experimental heterokaryons between B‐lymphocytes and mouse stem cell lines. I showed that ES cells that lack Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 (PRC2) failed to reprogram B cells and were unable to induce two early events that characterise successful B cell reprogramming; a global redistribution of HP1α and an increased serine 10 phosphorylation. In the second part of my study I confirmed that EG cells were able to induce DNA demethylation at several ICR in B cells following fusion. I present evidence that this reprogramming of the somatic genome requires Tet1 and Tet2 and is accomplished through a two‐step process involving both DNA synthesis and conversion of 5methylcytosine into 5hydroxymethylcytosine.
author2 Fisher, Amanda
author_facet Fisher, Amanda
Piccolo, Francesco M.
author Piccolo, Francesco M.
author_sort Piccolo, Francesco M.
title Reversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming
title_short Reversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming
title_full Reversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming
title_fullStr Reversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming
title_full_unstemmed Reversing DNA methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming
title_sort reversing dna methylation by heterokaryon-mediated reprogramming
publisher Imperial College London
publishDate 2013
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.616802
work_keys_str_mv AT piccolofrancescom reversingdnamethylationbyheterokaryonmediatedreprogramming
_version_ 1718465567004819456