Can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?

The context of this thesis lies both in labour law theory and labour law literature on ‘precarious’ work. In this thesis, the concern is to show that although precarious work is presented as a modern problem with distinctive modern solutions in the literature, the problems of precarious work can use...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodgers, Lisa
Other Authors: Bell, Mark
Published: University of Leicester 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.602662
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-602662
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6026622016-08-04T04:00:37ZCan a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?Rodgers, LisaBell, Mark2014The context of this thesis lies both in labour law theory and labour law literature on ‘precarious’ work. In this thesis, the concern is to show that although precarious work is presented as a modern problem with distinctive modern solutions in the literature, the problems of precarious work can usefully be aligned with more general attempts to determine the problems and solutions to vulnerability at work. In the first part of the thesis, the analysis proceeds by the construction of a ‘theory’ of vulnerability based around a ‘wide’, ‘middle’ and ‘narrow’ view. It is argued that these different ‘views’ have a certain internal coherence and represent a particular way of seeing both the challenges faced by labour and the best way to tackle those challenges. The second part of this thesis looks at the application of this theoretical framework. It is argued that these different ‘views’ represent a good way of analysing approaches at different geographical levels of regulation (UK, EU and international) to the problems of precarious work. Finally, the thesis investigates two case studies and suggests that these different ‘views’ can be used to analyse the approach taken to different ‘vulnerable’ or ‘precarious’ groups of workers in the labour market.344.01University of Leicesterhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.602662http://hdl.handle.net/2381/28810Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 344.01
spellingShingle 344.01
Rodgers, Lisa
Can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?
description The context of this thesis lies both in labour law theory and labour law literature on ‘precarious’ work. In this thesis, the concern is to show that although precarious work is presented as a modern problem with distinctive modern solutions in the literature, the problems of precarious work can usefully be aligned with more general attempts to determine the problems and solutions to vulnerability at work. In the first part of the thesis, the analysis proceeds by the construction of a ‘theory’ of vulnerability based around a ‘wide’, ‘middle’ and ‘narrow’ view. It is argued that these different ‘views’ have a certain internal coherence and represent a particular way of seeing both the challenges faced by labour and the best way to tackle those challenges. The second part of this thesis looks at the application of this theoretical framework. It is argued that these different ‘views’ represent a good way of analysing approaches at different geographical levels of regulation (UK, EU and international) to the problems of precarious work. Finally, the thesis investigates two case studies and suggests that these different ‘views’ can be used to analyse the approach taken to different ‘vulnerable’ or ‘precarious’ groups of workers in the labour market.
author2 Bell, Mark
author_facet Bell, Mark
Rodgers, Lisa
author Rodgers, Lisa
author_sort Rodgers, Lisa
title Can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?
title_short Can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?
title_full Can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?
title_fullStr Can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?
title_full_unstemmed Can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?
title_sort can a legal theory of 'vulnerability in employment' be constructed and does it represent a valid organising principle for the regulation of precarious work?
publisher University of Leicester
publishDate 2014
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.602662
work_keys_str_mv AT rodgerslisa canalegaltheoryofvulnerabilityinemploymentbeconstructedanddoesitrepresentavalidorganisingprinciplefortheregulationofprecariouswork
_version_ 1718372221382033408