Magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?

Belief in the healing power of magnets can be traced back to 200AD when magnetic rings were used as cure for arthritis. In the 18th century such beliefs led to the development of the controlled clinical trial. Yet, despite resulting association with charlatanism, magnet therapy is now a multi billio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richmond, Stewart J.
Published: University of York 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.583362
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-583362
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5833622015-03-20T05:37:06ZMagnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?Richmond, Stewart J.2010Belief in the healing power of magnets can be traced back to 200AD when magnetic rings were used as cure for arthritis. In the 18th century such beliefs led to the development of the controlled clinical trial. Yet, despite resulting association with charlatanism, magnet therapy is now a multi billion dollar worldwide industry. Magnetic bracelets in particular are widely reported to alleviate the pain and inflammation of arthritis. The central aims of this thesis were to describe the contextual basis for magnet therapy, to review previous research, and to determine whether magnet therapy has any real benefit for people with arthritis. If true the implications would be far reaching. This thesis provides the first systematic review to focus specifically on evidence concerning magnet therapy for arthritis. Findings from previous trials suggest that the practice of wearing permanent magnets has meaningful analgesic effects. However, several of these trials were hampered by methodological problems. Two further randomised controlled crossover trials led by the present author are therefore described. These employed robust methods of controlling for non-specific treatment effects, involving multiple control devices including the novel use of copper bracelets as placebos. Numerous self-reported outcomes were measured. The latest trial also included objective physiological data on inflammation. Findings from these studies demonstrate that magnetic wrist straps, and also copper bracelets, represent ineffective treatment options for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. This research also confirmed that demagnetised control devices do not represent valid placebos, but that weak magnets and copper bracelets may adequately control for the effects of treatment expectancy. Subsequent synthesis of data from these and previous trials using meta-analysis, and addressing problems of blinding, indicates that magnet therapy lacks any specific (i.e. genuine) therapeutic benefit for people with arthritis. This conclusion and its implications for patient education, clinical practice and research are discussed.616.72206University of Yorkhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.583362Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.72206
spellingShingle 616.72206
Richmond, Stewart J.
Magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?
description Belief in the healing power of magnets can be traced back to 200AD when magnetic rings were used as cure for arthritis. In the 18th century such beliefs led to the development of the controlled clinical trial. Yet, despite resulting association with charlatanism, magnet therapy is now a multi billion dollar worldwide industry. Magnetic bracelets in particular are widely reported to alleviate the pain and inflammation of arthritis. The central aims of this thesis were to describe the contextual basis for magnet therapy, to review previous research, and to determine whether magnet therapy has any real benefit for people with arthritis. If true the implications would be far reaching. This thesis provides the first systematic review to focus specifically on evidence concerning magnet therapy for arthritis. Findings from previous trials suggest that the practice of wearing permanent magnets has meaningful analgesic effects. However, several of these trials were hampered by methodological problems. Two further randomised controlled crossover trials led by the present author are therefore described. These employed robust methods of controlling for non-specific treatment effects, involving multiple control devices including the novel use of copper bracelets as placebos. Numerous self-reported outcomes were measured. The latest trial also included objective physiological data on inflammation. Findings from these studies demonstrate that magnetic wrist straps, and also copper bracelets, represent ineffective treatment options for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. This research also confirmed that demagnetised control devices do not represent valid placebos, but that weak magnets and copper bracelets may adequately control for the effects of treatment expectancy. Subsequent synthesis of data from these and previous trials using meta-analysis, and addressing problems of blinding, indicates that magnet therapy lacks any specific (i.e. genuine) therapeutic benefit for people with arthritis. This conclusion and its implications for patient education, clinical practice and research are discussed.
author Richmond, Stewart J.
author_facet Richmond, Stewart J.
author_sort Richmond, Stewart J.
title Magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?
title_short Magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?
title_full Magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?
title_fullStr Magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?
title_full_unstemmed Magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?
title_sort magnet therapy for arthritis : a fable of attraction?
publisher University of York
publishDate 2010
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.583362
work_keys_str_mv AT richmondstewartj magnettherapyforarthritisafableofattraction
_version_ 1716793081616924672