Rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education

Attitude has been recognised as an important determinant of pupils' interests in science and their willingness to engage with the subject (Osborne et al. 2003). Thus, a determination of pupils' attitudes towards science in school and in the wider context is important. Reportedly, some pupi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hamilton, Iona Mary Jane
Published: Queen's University Belfast 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.579717
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-579717
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5797172015-03-20T04:52:50ZRose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science educationHamilton, Iona Mary Jane2012Attitude has been recognised as an important determinant of pupils' interests in science and their willingness to engage with the subject (Osborne et al. 2003). Thus, a determination of pupils' attitudes towards science in school and in the wider context is important. Reportedly, some pupils are unable to find any relevance for the science they experience in the classroom with their everyday lives (Schreiner and Sjeberg 2004). This study examined the attitudes of pupils in Northern Ireland towards science. As one of the original partners of the international Relevance of Science Education (ROSE) project, the views of an initial cohort of 847 pupils in Northern Ireland were collected in 2003/4. That sample provided a baseline to compare with the responses from a second cohort of 752 pupils in 2008/9. Pupils' attitudes were determined using the ROSE questionnaire in a survey-based methodology (Schreiner and Sjeberg 2004). The addition of a comment and/or drawing to some questionnaires, and the inclusion of 32 pupils in focus-group interviews, provided additional data outside the questionnaire. The evidence reinforced the potential of qualitative methods to provide further insight about pupils' opinions. The results showed a high level of similarity comparing pupils' responses between survey groups, even after a five-year interval. That evidence suggested consistency in pupils' opinions over time. The findings suggested boys were generally more positive than girls. There was also evidence of differences by the level of science studied, with separate sciences pupils generally holding more positive views compared with single and double award groups.507.10416Queen's University Belfasthttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.579717Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 507.10416
spellingShingle 507.10416
Hamilton, Iona Mary Jane
Rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education
description Attitude has been recognised as an important determinant of pupils' interests in science and their willingness to engage with the subject (Osborne et al. 2003). Thus, a determination of pupils' attitudes towards science in school and in the wider context is important. Reportedly, some pupils are unable to find any relevance for the science they experience in the classroom with their everyday lives (Schreiner and Sjeberg 2004). This study examined the attitudes of pupils in Northern Ireland towards science. As one of the original partners of the international Relevance of Science Education (ROSE) project, the views of an initial cohort of 847 pupils in Northern Ireland were collected in 2003/4. That sample provided a baseline to compare with the responses from a second cohort of 752 pupils in 2008/9. Pupils' attitudes were determined using the ROSE questionnaire in a survey-based methodology (Schreiner and Sjeberg 2004). The addition of a comment and/or drawing to some questionnaires, and the inclusion of 32 pupils in focus-group interviews, provided additional data outside the questionnaire. The evidence reinforced the potential of qualitative methods to provide further insight about pupils' opinions. The results showed a high level of similarity comparing pupils' responses between survey groups, even after a five-year interval. That evidence suggested consistency in pupils' opinions over time. The findings suggested boys were generally more positive than girls. There was also evidence of differences by the level of science studied, with separate sciences pupils generally holding more positive views compared with single and double award groups.
author Hamilton, Iona Mary Jane
author_facet Hamilton, Iona Mary Jane
author_sort Hamilton, Iona Mary Jane
title Rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education
title_short Rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education
title_full Rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education
title_fullStr Rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education
title_full_unstemmed Rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education
title_sort rose revisited : an analysis of pupils' opinions on the relevance of science education
publisher Queen's University Belfast
publishDate 2012
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.579717
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltonionamaryjane roserevisitedananalysisofpupilsopinionsontherelevanceofscienceeducation
_version_ 1716787427387899904