The rationale for the incarnation and the place of substitutionary atonement in the thought of William Temple and Michael Ramsey : a comparative study
William Temple (1881-1944) and Michael Ramsey (1904-1988) are two of the leading Anglican intellectuals of the twentieth century. Their significance does not just lie in the quality of their intellect. Each served as Archbishop of Canterbury during their career; that essentially representative role...
Main Author: | Stuart, Christopher John |
---|---|
Published: |
Durham University
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.575777 |
Similar Items
-
PENAL SUBSTITUTIONARY ATONEMENT AS THE BASIS FOR NEW COVENANT AND NEW CREATION
by: Reid, Kenneth James
Published: (2015) -
Craig’s Anti–Platonism, Lowe’s Universals, and Christ’s Penal Substitutionary Atonement
by: R. Scott Smith
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
by: Sumner, Darren O.
Published: (2012) -
A critical analysis of the religious epistemology Ian T. Ramsey
by: Astley, Jeffrey
Published: (1978) -
William Temple and the practice of church unity : a theological and historical assessment
by: Loane, Edward Alexander
Published: (2015)