Barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care
Volume 1 of this thesis is presented in three parts. Part 1 is a review of outcome studies on text-based guided self-help for depression and anxiety in primary care, specifically focusing on satisfaction, adherence and attrition. Part 2 is a qualitative interview study examining the views and experi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
University College London (University of London)
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.565448 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-565448 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5654482016-11-18T03:18:15ZBarriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary careQuigley, A.2011Volume 1 of this thesis is presented in three parts. Part 1 is a review of outcome studies on text-based guided self-help for depression and anxiety in primary care, specifically focusing on satisfaction, adherence and attrition. Part 2 is a qualitative interview study examining the views and experiences of 13 people (plus two more who gave details via email) who attended a guided self-help service and did not engage or did not benefit. Part 3 is a critical appraisal of the research process, which considers some of the conceptual and methodological issues encountered, before concluding with a discussion of personal reflections on the impact of the research on the participants and researcher.362.1University College London (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.565448http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1325644/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
362.1 |
spellingShingle |
362.1 Quigley, A. Barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care |
description |
Volume 1 of this thesis is presented in three parts. Part 1 is a review of outcome studies on text-based guided self-help for depression and anxiety in primary care, specifically focusing on satisfaction, adherence and attrition. Part 2 is a qualitative interview study examining the views and experiences of 13 people (plus two more who gave details via email) who attended a guided self-help service and did not engage or did not benefit. Part 3 is a critical appraisal of the research process, which considers some of the conceptual and methodological issues encountered, before concluding with a discussion of personal reflections on the impact of the research on the participants and researcher. |
author |
Quigley, A. |
author_facet |
Quigley, A. |
author_sort |
Quigley, A. |
title |
Barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care |
title_short |
Barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care |
title_full |
Barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care |
title_fullStr |
Barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed |
Barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care |
title_sort |
barriers to engaging with assisted bibliotherapy in primary care |
publisher |
University College London (University of London) |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.565448 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT quigleya barrierstoengagingwithassistedbibliotherapyinprimarycare |
_version_ |
1718393249279770624 |