Revanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008

The theme of this thesis concerns post-Soviet Russian foreign policy perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008. In the thesis I argue that Russian perceptions became increasingly revanchist in nature during this period, and that we may distinguish between two differen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nilsson, R.
Published: University College London (University of London) 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.564818
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-564818
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5648182016-11-18T03:18:16ZRevanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008Nilsson, R.2010The theme of this thesis concerns post-Soviet Russian foreign policy perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008. In the thesis I argue that Russian perceptions became increasingly revanchist in nature during this period, and that we may distinguish between two different types of revanchism, the consequences of which for Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty are quite different. I argue that all Russian perceptions of international affairs are constituted by perceptions of Russia. Thus, perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty may be divided into three categories, or paradigms, each of which centres on a specific concept that legitimises the existence of Russia, and determines how Belarus and Ukraine are viewed. The three central concepts are the concepts of Law, Power, and Nation, respectively. In the introduction, I outline these paradigms, both in abstract terms and in relation to Russian foreign policy in general, as well as Russian foreign policy towards Belarus and Ukraine. Subsequently, I present my methodology and my literature review, together with a discussion of the theoretical assumptions, which provide the foundation for my argument. Then, I briefly outline Russian foreign policy making during the period relevant for my thesis, before the four main chapters of my thesis outline in roughly chronological fashion how the relative significance of the three paradigms has changed over time. Overall, I find that whereas the paradigm of Power has generally dominated perceptions, the paradigm of Law has gradually lost influence, whereas the influence of the paradigm of Nation has gradually increased. Since I define both the paradigm of Power and the paradigm of Nation as “revanchist,” I conclude that Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008 gradually became more revanchist in nature.327.470477University College London (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.564818http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/19223/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 327.470477
spellingShingle 327.470477
Nilsson, R.
Revanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008
description The theme of this thesis concerns post-Soviet Russian foreign policy perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008. In the thesis I argue that Russian perceptions became increasingly revanchist in nature during this period, and that we may distinguish between two different types of revanchism, the consequences of which for Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty are quite different. I argue that all Russian perceptions of international affairs are constituted by perceptions of Russia. Thus, perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty may be divided into three categories, or paradigms, each of which centres on a specific concept that legitimises the existence of Russia, and determines how Belarus and Ukraine are viewed. The three central concepts are the concepts of Law, Power, and Nation, respectively. In the introduction, I outline these paradigms, both in abstract terms and in relation to Russian foreign policy in general, as well as Russian foreign policy towards Belarus and Ukraine. Subsequently, I present my methodology and my literature review, together with a discussion of the theoretical assumptions, which provide the foundation for my argument. Then, I briefly outline Russian foreign policy making during the period relevant for my thesis, before the four main chapters of my thesis outline in roughly chronological fashion how the relative significance of the three paradigms has changed over time. Overall, I find that whereas the paradigm of Power has generally dominated perceptions, the paradigm of Law has gradually lost influence, whereas the influence of the paradigm of Nation has gradually increased. Since I define both the paradigm of Power and the paradigm of Nation as “revanchist,” I conclude that Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008 gradually became more revanchist in nature.
author Nilsson, R.
author_facet Nilsson, R.
author_sort Nilsson, R.
title Revanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008
title_short Revanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008
title_full Revanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008
title_fullStr Revanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008
title_full_unstemmed Revanchist Russia? : Russian perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008
title_sort revanchist russia? : russian perceptions of belarusian and ukrainian sovereignty, 1990-2008
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2010
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.564818
work_keys_str_mv AT nilssonr revanchistrussiarussianperceptionsofbelarusianandukrainiansovereignty19902008
_version_ 1718393220757454848