The enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries

Because of the importance attached to intangible assets in the modern world, the remedies for intellectual property infringement have been brought under the spotlight.  In this background, there has been an increased interest regarding the scope and desirability of using criminal sanctions for the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kumarage, Thushara
Published: University of Aberdeen 2010
Subjects:
340
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.542634
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-542634
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5426342015-03-20T04:06:58ZThe enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countriesKumarage, Thushara2010Because of the importance attached to intangible assets in the modern world, the remedies for intellectual property infringement have been brought under the spotlight.  In this background, there has been an increased interest regarding the scope and desirability of using criminal sanctions for the protection of IPR, especially in cases involving commercial-scale counterfeiting and piracy.  However, this development has been received with mixed sentiments, with some commentators criticising the legitimacy of using criminal law for the protection of private property rights. This thesis undertakes a search for a coherent justification for criminalising intellectual property infringement.  The thesis also attempts to demonstrate the evolution and progression of criminal enforcement of IPR at the international level.  Furthermore, the thesis analyses crosscutting issues encountered by developing countries when enforcing criminal sanctions, thereby explaining the reluctance to reform criminal remedies for IPR infringement in these countries.  The thesis identifies criminal sanctions as a desirable remedy for countering the rising threat of piracy and counterfeiting.  It also highlights the achievements and shortcomings of multilateral actions taken thus far in relation to criminal IPR enforcement, thereby providing valuable insights for future negotiations.  Finally, it emphasises that a criminal IPR enforcement regime in any jurisdiction should be evaluated with caution, giving due consideration to other economic development interests and priorities of developing countries.340Intellectual property rightsUniversity of Aberdeenhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.542634http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=166651Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 340
Intellectual property rights
spellingShingle 340
Intellectual property rights
Kumarage, Thushara
The enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries
description Because of the importance attached to intangible assets in the modern world, the remedies for intellectual property infringement have been brought under the spotlight.  In this background, there has been an increased interest regarding the scope and desirability of using criminal sanctions for the protection of IPR, especially in cases involving commercial-scale counterfeiting and piracy.  However, this development has been received with mixed sentiments, with some commentators criticising the legitimacy of using criminal law for the protection of private property rights. This thesis undertakes a search for a coherent justification for criminalising intellectual property infringement.  The thesis also attempts to demonstrate the evolution and progression of criminal enforcement of IPR at the international level.  Furthermore, the thesis analyses crosscutting issues encountered by developing countries when enforcing criminal sanctions, thereby explaining the reluctance to reform criminal remedies for IPR infringement in these countries.  The thesis identifies criminal sanctions as a desirable remedy for countering the rising threat of piracy and counterfeiting.  It also highlights the achievements and shortcomings of multilateral actions taken thus far in relation to criminal IPR enforcement, thereby providing valuable insights for future negotiations.  Finally, it emphasises that a criminal IPR enforcement regime in any jurisdiction should be evaluated with caution, giving due consideration to other economic development interests and priorities of developing countries.
author Kumarage, Thushara
author_facet Kumarage, Thushara
author_sort Kumarage, Thushara
title The enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries
title_short The enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries
title_full The enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries
title_fullStr The enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries
title_full_unstemmed The enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries
title_sort enforcement of criminal sanctions against intellectual property rights' infringement : justification, progression and impediments in developing countries
publisher University of Aberdeen
publishDate 2010
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.542634
work_keys_str_mv AT kumaragethushara theenforcementofcriminalsanctionsagainstintellectualpropertyrightsinfringementjustificationprogressionandimpedimentsindevelopingcountries
AT kumaragethushara enforcementofcriminalsanctionsagainstintellectualpropertyrightsinfringementjustificationprogressionandimpedimentsindevelopingcountries
_version_ 1716784229662064640