Prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis

Phase III trials for new tuberculosis treatment regimens require large numbers of participants and can take over five years to complete. A surrogate marker for poor outcome (failure at end of treatment or recurrence following successful treatment), the established endpoint in such trials, could shor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Phillips, Patrick Peter John
Other Authors: Fielding, K. ; Babiker, A.
Published: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (University of London) 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.536901
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-536901
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5369012019-01-29T03:21:30ZPrognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosisPhillips, Patrick Peter JohnFielding, K. ; Babiker, A.2009Phase III trials for new tuberculosis treatment regimens require large numbers of participants and can take over five years to complete. A surrogate marker for poor outcome (failure at end of treatment or recurrence following successful treatment), the established endpoint in such trials, could shorten trial duration and reduce trial size. Culture results after two months of treatment have shown the most promise but, prior to this research, no formal evaluation had been performed. In this thesis, culture results during treatment are evaluated as prognostic and surrogate markers for poor outcome using data on 6974 patients from twelve tuberculosis treatment randomised controlled multi-arm trials conducted in East Africa and East Asia. A strong association was found between culture results during treatment and poor outcome. Nevertheless, culture results were not good patient-specific predictors of poor outcome with low sensitivities and specificities. Existing meta-analytic methods for evaluating surrogate markers are not wholly suited to this setting of multi-arm trials with binary true and surrogate endpoints. Extending these methods, the two month culture was found to be a good surrogate marker using data from Hong Kong trials and the three month culture was found to be a good surrogate marker using data from East African trials. These results are an indication that cultures during treatment do capture some of the treatment effect. Further work is needed in understanding the differences between the Hong Kong and East African trials. The meta-analytic methods for evaluating surrogate markers in this thesis included a graphical representation that permitted a clear visual evaluation of the surrogate. Methods developed in this thesis for modelling the relationship between the treatment effects on the true and surrogate endpoints were not satisfactory. The deficiencies were not overcome with the two extensions proposed. Further work is needed in developing a more appropriate model.616.99London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (University of London)10.17037/PUBS.01544172https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.536901http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/1544172/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.99
spellingShingle 616.99
Phillips, Patrick Peter John
Prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis
description Phase III trials for new tuberculosis treatment regimens require large numbers of participants and can take over five years to complete. A surrogate marker for poor outcome (failure at end of treatment or recurrence following successful treatment), the established endpoint in such trials, could shorten trial duration and reduce trial size. Culture results after two months of treatment have shown the most promise but, prior to this research, no formal evaluation had been performed. In this thesis, culture results during treatment are evaluated as prognostic and surrogate markers for poor outcome using data on 6974 patients from twelve tuberculosis treatment randomised controlled multi-arm trials conducted in East Africa and East Asia. A strong association was found between culture results during treatment and poor outcome. Nevertheless, culture results were not good patient-specific predictors of poor outcome with low sensitivities and specificities. Existing meta-analytic methods for evaluating surrogate markers are not wholly suited to this setting of multi-arm trials with binary true and surrogate endpoints. Extending these methods, the two month culture was found to be a good surrogate marker using data from Hong Kong trials and the three month culture was found to be a good surrogate marker using data from East African trials. These results are an indication that cultures during treatment do capture some of the treatment effect. Further work is needed in understanding the differences between the Hong Kong and East African trials. The meta-analytic methods for evaluating surrogate markers in this thesis included a graphical representation that permitted a clear visual evaluation of the surrogate. Methods developed in this thesis for modelling the relationship between the treatment effects on the true and surrogate endpoints were not satisfactory. The deficiencies were not overcome with the two extensions proposed. Further work is needed in developing a more appropriate model.
author2 Fielding, K. ; Babiker, A.
author_facet Fielding, K. ; Babiker, A.
Phillips, Patrick Peter John
author Phillips, Patrick Peter John
author_sort Phillips, Patrick Peter John
title Prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis
title_short Prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full Prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis
title_fullStr Prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis
title_sort prognostic and surrogate markers for outcome in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis
publisher London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (University of London)
publishDate 2009
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.536901
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipspatrickpeterjohn prognosticandsurrogatemarkersforoutcomeinthetreatmentofpulmonarytuberculosis
_version_ 1718968683931369472