Porphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstruction

Everyone working on Porphyry's 'Against the Christians' refers to the fragment collection compiled by Adolf von Harnack in 1916. Harnack's scholarship was impressive, but his work is difficult to use, and needs revision in the light of new approaches to the collection and interpr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Magny, Ariane
Other Authors: Sandwell, Isabella
Published: University of Bristol 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.535231
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-535231
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5352312018-10-03T03:21:47ZPorphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstructionMagny, ArianeSandwell, Isabella2010Everyone working on Porphyry's 'Against the Christians' refers to the fragment collection compiled by Adolf von Harnack in 1916. Harnack's scholarship was impressive, but his work is difficult to use, and needs revision in the light of new approaches to the collection and interpretation of fragments. This dissertation draws mainly on the methodological work of Most et al. (1997) to argue that a fragment should not be read apart from its contextual framework. The dissertation analyses the fragments preserved in Eusebius, Jerome, and Augustine, and explains how each author's agenda, as well as their religious and intellectual contexts, influence the way in which they refer to Porphyry. Ultimately, this study aims at proposing a new fragment collection.930.1University of Bristolhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.535231http://hdl.handle.net/1983/d105292c-dfd6-4210-b53c-db5d1c4003f9Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 930.1
spellingShingle 930.1
Magny, Ariane
Porphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstruction
description Everyone working on Porphyry's 'Against the Christians' refers to the fragment collection compiled by Adolf von Harnack in 1916. Harnack's scholarship was impressive, but his work is difficult to use, and needs revision in the light of new approaches to the collection and interpretation of fragments. This dissertation draws mainly on the methodological work of Most et al. (1997) to argue that a fragment should not be read apart from its contextual framework. The dissertation analyses the fragments preserved in Eusebius, Jerome, and Augustine, and explains how each author's agenda, as well as their religious and intellectual contexts, influence the way in which they refer to Porphyry. Ultimately, this study aims at proposing a new fragment collection.
author2 Sandwell, Isabella
author_facet Sandwell, Isabella
Magny, Ariane
author Magny, Ariane
author_sort Magny, Ariane
title Porphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstruction
title_short Porphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstruction
title_full Porphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstruction
title_fullStr Porphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Porphyry in fragments : Eusebius, Jerome, Augustine and the problem of reconstruction
title_sort porphyry in fragments : eusebius, jerome, augustine and the problem of reconstruction
publisher University of Bristol
publishDate 2010
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.535231
work_keys_str_mv AT magnyariane porphyryinfragmentseusebiusjeromeaugustineandtheproblemofreconstruction
_version_ 1718757890364276736