Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework

Although diagrams are considered part and parcel of mathematics, mainstream mathematicians exhibit prejudice against the use of diagrams in public. Adopting a multimodality social semiotics approach, I consider diagrams as a semiotic mode of representation and communication which enable us to constr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alshwaikh, Jehad
Published: University College London (University of London) 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.534795
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-534795
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5347952018-07-24T03:13:34ZGeometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic frameworkAlshwaikh, Jehad2011Although diagrams are considered part and parcel of mathematics, mainstream mathematicians exhibit prejudice against the use of diagrams in public. Adopting a multimodality social semiotics approach, I consider diagrams as a semiotic mode of representation and communication which enable us to construct mathematical meaning. Mathematics is a multimodal discourse, where different modes of representation and communication are used, such as (spoken and written) language, algebraic notations, visual forms and gestures. These different modes have different meaning potentials. I suggest an analytic framework that can be used as a tool to analyse the kinds of meanings afforded by diagrams in mathematical discourse, focusing on geometry. Starting from characteristics of diagrams identified in the literature, I construct the framework using an iterative methodology tested with data from classrooms in the UK and the Occupied Palestinian territories and from textbooks. The classroom data consist of approximately 350 written mathematical texts in English and Arabic produced by 13- and 14-year-old students as a response to two geometrical problems, accompanied by audio and video records of their verbal and gestural interactions with each other while solving the problems. I then present the critical aspects of the development journey of the framework followed by a discussion of each of the three (meta)functions: ideational, interpersonal and textual. Each of these functions is illustrated by examples of diagrams from mathematical texts collected from the empirical data, textbooks and the Internet. Because I consider mathematics to be a social and cultural practice, I discuss the issue of culture and language in relation to the meanings of diagrams. Lastly, I discuss the implications of the study on representation and communication in mathematical discourse, with possible applications for the framework in learning and teaching mathematics.371.3University College London (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.534795http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10019961/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 371.3
spellingShingle 371.3
Alshwaikh, Jehad
Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework
description Although diagrams are considered part and parcel of mathematics, mainstream mathematicians exhibit prejudice against the use of diagrams in public. Adopting a multimodality social semiotics approach, I consider diagrams as a semiotic mode of representation and communication which enable us to construct mathematical meaning. Mathematics is a multimodal discourse, where different modes of representation and communication are used, such as (spoken and written) language, algebraic notations, visual forms and gestures. These different modes have different meaning potentials. I suggest an analytic framework that can be used as a tool to analyse the kinds of meanings afforded by diagrams in mathematical discourse, focusing on geometry. Starting from characteristics of diagrams identified in the literature, I construct the framework using an iterative methodology tested with data from classrooms in the UK and the Occupied Palestinian territories and from textbooks. The classroom data consist of approximately 350 written mathematical texts in English and Arabic produced by 13- and 14-year-old students as a response to two geometrical problems, accompanied by audio and video records of their verbal and gestural interactions with each other while solving the problems. I then present the critical aspects of the development journey of the framework followed by a discussion of each of the three (meta)functions: ideational, interpersonal and textual. Each of these functions is illustrated by examples of diagrams from mathematical texts collected from the empirical data, textbooks and the Internet. Because I consider mathematics to be a social and cultural practice, I discuss the issue of culture and language in relation to the meanings of diagrams. Lastly, I discuss the implications of the study on representation and communication in mathematical discourse, with possible applications for the framework in learning and teaching mathematics.
author Alshwaikh, Jehad
author_facet Alshwaikh, Jehad
author_sort Alshwaikh, Jehad
title Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework
title_short Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework
title_full Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework
title_fullStr Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework
title_full_unstemmed Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework
title_sort geometrical diagrams as representation and communication : a functional analytic framework
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2011
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.534795
work_keys_str_mv AT alshwaikhjehad geometricaldiagramsasrepresentationandcommunicationafunctionalanalyticframework
_version_ 1718713896563376128