Exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in London

Refugee people and the community organisations (COs) that work with them have been constructed within and by a variety of legal, social and political contexts within the UK in ways which have shaped their lives and work. Common constructions of refugee people as pathologised or threatening; and of C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Russon, C. E.
Published: University of East London 2008
Subjects:
150
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.532705
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-532705
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5327052015-12-03T04:01:48ZExploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in LondonRusson, C. E.2008Refugee people and the community organisations (COs) that work with them have been constructed within and by a variety of legal, social and political contexts within the UK in ways which have shaped their lives and work. Common constructions of refugee people as pathologised or threatening; and of COs as representative, integrative and also lacking have warranted a variety of social practices both comprising and governing the work of COs, and which have both empowering and disempowering effects for them and their service users. Despite the centralisation of COs in service delivery for refugee people, there is little research about them, and few accounts have either focussed on how they work or drawn on the perspectives of staff and service users of COs themselves. This study is an exploration of staff and service users' constructions of a CO working with refugee people in London. Nine people who were either staff or service users of a counsellingbased CO were interviewed and these interviews were analysed using discourse analysis drawing on the work of Foucault (e.g. 1961, 1977) and Malson (1998). Analysis of these interviews led to the identification of three main constructions of the work of the CO. These were 'Therapy 'under erasure'; 'Language and culture as currency' and 'Negotiating restrictions on agency'. Each of these constructions is discussed, together with the social practices warranted and actions made possible by them. Implications for power and agency are also addressed. In the final section, an evaluation of the research and its implications are presented.150University of East Londonhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.532705http://roar.uel.ac.uk/3776/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 150
spellingShingle 150
Russon, C. E.
Exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in London
description Refugee people and the community organisations (COs) that work with them have been constructed within and by a variety of legal, social and political contexts within the UK in ways which have shaped their lives and work. Common constructions of refugee people as pathologised or threatening; and of COs as representative, integrative and also lacking have warranted a variety of social practices both comprising and governing the work of COs, and which have both empowering and disempowering effects for them and their service users. Despite the centralisation of COs in service delivery for refugee people, there is little research about them, and few accounts have either focussed on how they work or drawn on the perspectives of staff and service users of COs themselves. This study is an exploration of staff and service users' constructions of a CO working with refugee people in London. Nine people who were either staff or service users of a counsellingbased CO were interviewed and these interviews were analysed using discourse analysis drawing on the work of Foucault (e.g. 1961, 1977) and Malson (1998). Analysis of these interviews led to the identification of three main constructions of the work of the CO. These were 'Therapy 'under erasure'; 'Language and culture as currency' and 'Negotiating restrictions on agency'. Each of these constructions is discussed, together with the social practices warranted and actions made possible by them. Implications for power and agency are also addressed. In the final section, an evaluation of the research and its implications are presented.
author Russon, C. E.
author_facet Russon, C. E.
author_sort Russon, C. E.
title Exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in London
title_short Exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in London
title_full Exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in London
title_fullStr Exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in London
title_full_unstemmed Exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in London
title_sort exploring staff and service users' constructions of a community organisation working with refugee people in london
publisher University of East London
publishDate 2008
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.532705
work_keys_str_mv AT russonce exploringstaffandserviceusersconstructionsofacommunityorganisationworkingwithrefugeepeopleinlondon
_version_ 1718143660932988928