Heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand

Heidegger is commonly assumed to have been at first uninterested in science, and then later on positively hostile towards it. This thesis sets out to re-evaluate Heidegger's attitude towards science in general by carefully reconstructing an account of natural science that lies, I claim, at the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beck, Adam
Published: Middlesex University 2002
Subjects:
111
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.519330
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-519330
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5193302015-03-20T04:52:09ZHeidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-handBeck, Adam2002Heidegger is commonly assumed to have been at first uninterested in science, and then later on positively hostile towards it. This thesis sets out to re-evaluate Heidegger's attitude towards science in general by carefully reconstructing an account of natural science that lies, I claim, at the heart of his major and early work, Being and Time. The existential conception of science articulated in this account revolves around three main issues: 1. ) The genesis of science from everyday pre-theoretical behaviour; 2. ) The structural necessity of crisis to the 'progress' of the sciences; 3. ) The transformation of the concept of scientific foundation in the light of the permanent necessity of scientific revolution. In the course of the reconstruction it becomes apparent that certain basic concepts of the existential analytic are in urgent need of reinterpretation. In particular, the concepts of objectivity and presence-at-hand need to be disentangled. Once separated, it becomes clear that Heidegger's work is not a critique of the notion of objectivity, but rather an attempt to salvage it from the wreckage of epistemology. Equally, the charge first levelled by Karl Löwith and then repeated by Paul Ricoeur that Heidegger 'forgets nature' proves premature. This rereading of fundamental ontology suggests, in addition, that Heidegger opens up a path largely not taken by 20th century philosophy of science. Heidegger's interpretation of relativity theory, taking its cue from Weyl's attempt to extend Einstein's thinking to electromagnetism, differs fundamentally from the response of figures such as Cassirer, Reichenbach, Carnap and Schlick. It offers a perspective on questions about the status of scientific theory outside of the usual three-cornered debate between empiricism, realism and constructivism. Finally, the recovery of a specifically Heideggerian conception of science, allows us to understand and evaluate Heidegger's claim that philosophy is the science of Being.111Middlesex Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.519330http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6363/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 111
spellingShingle 111
Beck, Adam
Heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand
description Heidegger is commonly assumed to have been at first uninterested in science, and then later on positively hostile towards it. This thesis sets out to re-evaluate Heidegger's attitude towards science in general by carefully reconstructing an account of natural science that lies, I claim, at the heart of his major and early work, Being and Time. The existential conception of science articulated in this account revolves around three main issues: 1. ) The genesis of science from everyday pre-theoretical behaviour; 2. ) The structural necessity of crisis to the 'progress' of the sciences; 3. ) The transformation of the concept of scientific foundation in the light of the permanent necessity of scientific revolution. In the course of the reconstruction it becomes apparent that certain basic concepts of the existential analytic are in urgent need of reinterpretation. In particular, the concepts of objectivity and presence-at-hand need to be disentangled. Once separated, it becomes clear that Heidegger's work is not a critique of the notion of objectivity, but rather an attempt to salvage it from the wreckage of epistemology. Equally, the charge first levelled by Karl Löwith and then repeated by Paul Ricoeur that Heidegger 'forgets nature' proves premature. This rereading of fundamental ontology suggests, in addition, that Heidegger opens up a path largely not taken by 20th century philosophy of science. Heidegger's interpretation of relativity theory, taking its cue from Weyl's attempt to extend Einstein's thinking to electromagnetism, differs fundamentally from the response of figures such as Cassirer, Reichenbach, Carnap and Schlick. It offers a perspective on questions about the status of scientific theory outside of the usual three-cornered debate between empiricism, realism and constructivism. Finally, the recovery of a specifically Heideggerian conception of science, allows us to understand and evaluate Heidegger's claim that philosophy is the science of Being.
author Beck, Adam
author_facet Beck, Adam
author_sort Beck, Adam
title Heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand
title_short Heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand
title_full Heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand
title_fullStr Heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand
title_full_unstemmed Heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand
title_sort heidegger and science : nature, objectivity and the present-at-hand
publisher Middlesex University
publishDate 2002
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.519330
work_keys_str_mv AT beckadam heideggerandsciencenatureobjectivityandthepresentathand
_version_ 1716787172989730816