The limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee return

The thesis examines protections afforded by the emerging right in international law of refugees or internally displaced persons to retum to their homes of origin following conflict. The establishment of discrete, quasi-judicial housing and property restitution mechanisms (for example in Kosovo and B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smit, Anneke
Published: University of Reading 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.501336
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-501336
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5013362015-03-20T05:18:18ZThe limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee returnSmit, Anneke2008The thesis examines protections afforded by the emerging right in international law of refugees or internally displaced persons to retum to their homes of origin following conflict. The establishment of discrete, quasi-judicial housing and property restitution mechanisms (for example in Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina) promising "restitution in kind" has become the preferred approach of the international community. Their attractiveness is that they promise both legal redress and a practical outcome - the retum of refugees and IDPs to their homes. However, as the thesis discusses, the desires of refugees and IDPs often shift over a long displacement, to the point that return often no longer equates with going "home". Meanwhile ties begin to form with the host community. The thesis assesses the effectiveness of restitution mechanisms as concerns the decision-making of refugees and displaced persons, and concludes that they will be useful if undertaken quickly and in coordination with a larger project to encourage return. In protracted refugee situations, by contrast, restitution is unlikely to lead to widespread retum. A wider array of remedies (including increased use of compensation in place of restitution in kind) and approaches to the protection of housing and property rights for displaced persons should be available. Further, rather than detracting from the rights-based approach, such solutions are solidly rooted in the larger property rights discourse and may in fact strengthen protections of the rights to housing and property for returnees. Based in qualitative and quantitative empirical research, the last chapter presents a case study of protracted displacement and the possibilities for housing and property rights approaches which support a range of durable solutions in the Republic of Georgia and South Ossetia.323.46086914University of Readinghttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.501336Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 323.46086914
spellingShingle 323.46086914
Smit, Anneke
The limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee return
description The thesis examines protections afforded by the emerging right in international law of refugees or internally displaced persons to retum to their homes of origin following conflict. The establishment of discrete, quasi-judicial housing and property restitution mechanisms (for example in Kosovo and Bosnia-Herzegovina) promising "restitution in kind" has become the preferred approach of the international community. Their attractiveness is that they promise both legal redress and a practical outcome - the retum of refugees and IDPs to their homes. However, as the thesis discusses, the desires of refugees and IDPs often shift over a long displacement, to the point that return often no longer equates with going "home". Meanwhile ties begin to form with the host community. The thesis assesses the effectiveness of restitution mechanisms as concerns the decision-making of refugees and displaced persons, and concludes that they will be useful if undertaken quickly and in coordination with a larger project to encourage return. In protracted refugee situations, by contrast, restitution is unlikely to lead to widespread retum. A wider array of remedies (including increased use of compensation in place of restitution in kind) and approaches to the protection of housing and property rights for displaced persons should be available. Further, rather than detracting from the rights-based approach, such solutions are solidly rooted in the larger property rights discourse and may in fact strengthen protections of the rights to housing and property for returnees. Based in qualitative and quantitative empirical research, the last chapter presents a case study of protracted displacement and the possibilities for housing and property rights approaches which support a range of durable solutions in the Republic of Georgia and South Ossetia.
author Smit, Anneke
author_facet Smit, Anneke
author_sort Smit, Anneke
title The limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee return
title_short The limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee return
title_full The limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee return
title_fullStr The limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee return
title_full_unstemmed The limits of housing and property restitution and IDP/refugee return
title_sort limits of housing and property restitution and idp/refugee return
publisher University of Reading
publishDate 2008
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.501336
work_keys_str_mv AT smitanneke thelimitsofhousingandpropertyrestitutionandidprefugeereturn
AT smitanneke limitsofhousingandpropertyrestitutionandidprefugeereturn
_version_ 1716790401587740672