Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis

This study aims to explore supervisors' perspectives of their supervisory relationships (SRs) with trainee clinical psychologists, particularly the ways in which they enhance these relationships, and identify and resolve problems.A retrospective qualitative design was used, and clinical psychol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clohessy, Sue
Other Authors: Beinart, Helen
Published: University of Hull 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.494852
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-494852
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4948522015-03-20T04:39:38ZSupervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysisClohessy, SueBeinart, Helen2008This study aims to explore supervisors' perspectives of their supervisory relationships (SRs) with trainee clinical psychologists, particularly the ways in which they enhance these relationships, and identify and resolve problems.A retrospective qualitative design was used, and clinical psychologists with experience of a range of SRs with trainees participated in the study. Method: Twelve supervisors completed a semi-structured interview about their effective and ineffective SRs with trainees. The data was analysed using Grounded Theory.Three core categories were highlighted regarding the quality of the SR's contextual influences, the flow of supervision and core relational factors. Contextual influences, which influenced the development of the SR included the team or service context, the training course and individual factors the supervisor and trainee contribute to the relationship. The flow of supervision incorporated the supervisor's investment in the SR and the trainee's openness to learning. The core relational factors of the SR incorporated interpersonal connection, emotional tone and the degree of openness, honesty, safety and trust. The findings suggested a reciprocal relationship between the core relational factors, the supervisor's investment in the SR, and the trainee's openness to learning. Strains in the SR can occur in any of the three categories, and the findings suggest that the supervisor's investment in the SR and the trainee's openness to learning improve the chances of problems being resolved. A resolution cycle was highlighted which incorporated noticing the problem, gathering information, formulating and intervening.The findings are discussed in relation to relevant theory and research. The implications for future research, theory and training are highlighted.658.43PsychologyUniversity of Hullhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.494852http://hydra.hull.ac.uk/resources/hull:1607Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 658.43
Psychology
spellingShingle 658.43
Psychology
Clohessy, Sue
Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
description This study aims to explore supervisors' perspectives of their supervisory relationships (SRs) with trainee clinical psychologists, particularly the ways in which they enhance these relationships, and identify and resolve problems.A retrospective qualitative design was used, and clinical psychologists with experience of a range of SRs with trainees participated in the study. Method: Twelve supervisors completed a semi-structured interview about their effective and ineffective SRs with trainees. The data was analysed using Grounded Theory.Three core categories were highlighted regarding the quality of the SR's contextual influences, the flow of supervision and core relational factors. Contextual influences, which influenced the development of the SR included the team or service context, the training course and individual factors the supervisor and trainee contribute to the relationship. The flow of supervision incorporated the supervisor's investment in the SR and the trainee's openness to learning. The core relational factors of the SR incorporated interpersonal connection, emotional tone and the degree of openness, honesty, safety and trust. The findings suggested a reciprocal relationship between the core relational factors, the supervisor's investment in the SR, and the trainee's openness to learning. Strains in the SR can occur in any of the three categories, and the findings suggest that the supervisor's investment in the SR and the trainee's openness to learning improve the chances of problems being resolved. A resolution cycle was highlighted which incorporated noticing the problem, gathering information, formulating and intervening.The findings are discussed in relation to relevant theory and research. The implications for future research, theory and training are highlighted.
author2 Beinart, Helen
author_facet Beinart, Helen
Clohessy, Sue
author Clohessy, Sue
author_sort Clohessy, Sue
title Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
title_short Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
title_full Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
title_fullStr Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
title_sort supervisors' perspectives on their supervisory relationships : a qualitative analysis
publisher University of Hull
publishDate 2008
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.494852
work_keys_str_mv AT clohessysue supervisorsperspectivesontheirsupervisoryrelationshipsaqualitativeanalysis
_version_ 1716785857491369984