Hegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism

In this thesis I investigate Hegel's idealism and Plotinus' and Jacobi' varieties of mysticism. My intention was to examine Hegel's reception of Plotinus and discover whether it is textually accurate in relation to the texts from Plotinus' Enneads. I discovered that Hegel�...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tavoularis, Stylianos
Published: University of Sheffield 2006
Subjects:
100
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.485070
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-485070
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4850702017-12-24T16:39:31ZHegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticismTavoularis, Stylianos2006In this thesis I investigate Hegel's idealism and Plotinus' and Jacobi' varieties of mysticism. My intention was to examine Hegel's reception of Plotinus and discover whether it is textually accurate in relation to the texts from Plotinus' Enneads. I discovered that Hegel's interpretation is not consistent with the Plotinian texts and I concluded that Hegel misinterpreted Plotinus despite his commitment in the Introduction to the Lectures on the History ofPhilosophy not to attribute to earlier philosophers what's not historically reported about their philosophies. In part this misinterpretation is explained by the fact that Hegel also committed himself in the Introduction to avoid historicism as well as one-sided critical accounts. I also discovered that Hegel had also a more specific hermeneutical intention as regards his treatment of Plotinus, which was to protect him from the charge ofbeing a mystic. Plotinus was vulnerable to this charge -as Hegel explains- because of the doctrine ofthe 'ecstasy', the alleged ineffability ofhis absolute and finally because of his representational rather than philosophical language. Hegel's defence suggests that Plotinus was not a mystic at all but rather that he should be view as anticipating Hegel's cardinal doctrine ofReason, which is in-and-for itself. My next intention was to explain Hegel's bias behind his misinterpretation ofPlotinus and I discovered that Hegel had been defending Plotinus precisely on the same core issues that he had been criticising his contemporary self-proclaimed mystic, F. H. Jacobi. Thus I provided a general account of Jacobi and then Hegel's critique of Jacobi to demonstrate the dangerous similarities between Plotinus and Jacobi. Finally I have suggested an alternative way to distinguish between Plotinus and Jacobi, which however distinguishes between two varieties of mysticism rather than idealism and mysticism as Hegel intended his distinction between Plotinus and Jacobi to be.100University of Sheffieldhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.485070Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 100
spellingShingle 100
Tavoularis, Stylianos
Hegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism
description In this thesis I investigate Hegel's idealism and Plotinus' and Jacobi' varieties of mysticism. My intention was to examine Hegel's reception of Plotinus and discover whether it is textually accurate in relation to the texts from Plotinus' Enneads. I discovered that Hegel's interpretation is not consistent with the Plotinian texts and I concluded that Hegel misinterpreted Plotinus despite his commitment in the Introduction to the Lectures on the History ofPhilosophy not to attribute to earlier philosophers what's not historically reported about their philosophies. In part this misinterpretation is explained by the fact that Hegel also committed himself in the Introduction to avoid historicism as well as one-sided critical accounts. I also discovered that Hegel had also a more specific hermeneutical intention as regards his treatment of Plotinus, which was to protect him from the charge ofbeing a mystic. Plotinus was vulnerable to this charge -as Hegel explains- because of the doctrine ofthe 'ecstasy', the alleged ineffability ofhis absolute and finally because of his representational rather than philosophical language. Hegel's defence suggests that Plotinus was not a mystic at all but rather that he should be view as anticipating Hegel's cardinal doctrine ofReason, which is in-and-for itself. My next intention was to explain Hegel's bias behind his misinterpretation ofPlotinus and I discovered that Hegel had been defending Plotinus precisely on the same core issues that he had been criticising his contemporary self-proclaimed mystic, F. H. Jacobi. Thus I provided a general account of Jacobi and then Hegel's critique of Jacobi to demonstrate the dangerous similarities between Plotinus and Jacobi. Finally I have suggested an alternative way to distinguish between Plotinus and Jacobi, which however distinguishes between two varieties of mysticism rather than idealism and mysticism as Hegel intended his distinction between Plotinus and Jacobi to be.
author Tavoularis, Stylianos
author_facet Tavoularis, Stylianos
author_sort Tavoularis, Stylianos
title Hegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism
title_short Hegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism
title_full Hegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism
title_fullStr Hegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism
title_full_unstemmed Hegel, Plotinus and Jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism
title_sort hegel, plotinus and jacobi: idealism and two varieties of mysticism
publisher University of Sheffield
publishDate 2006
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.485070
work_keys_str_mv AT tavoularisstylianos hegelplotinusandjacobiidealismandtwovarietiesofmysticism
_version_ 1718578612692582400