The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë

Charlotte Brontë wrote some memorable criticism of Jane Austen. What particularly affronted her was Jane Austen's treatment of emotion. This suggests grounds for comparison. If conducted historically the comparison makes more sense. It also helps to consider the novel as 'conjectural histo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scannell, Michael
Published: University of Oxford 1975
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.471743
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-471743
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4717432015-03-19T05:18:32ZThe treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte BrontëScannell, Michael1975Charlotte Brontë wrote some memorable criticism of Jane Austen. What particularly affronted her was Jane Austen's treatment of emotion. This suggests grounds for comparison. If conducted historically the comparison makes more sense. It also helps to consider the novel as 'conjectural history', i.e. to assign (some) novels not to the category of make-believe (creating imaginary worlds which only make sense if certain conventions are accepted), nor that of lying (evoking possible but partial worlds for consolation), but that of guesswork (considering what might have happened in this world).820.9008Criticism and interpretation : Emotions in literatureUniversity of Oxfordhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.471743http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:c06efcb4-b5d6-40e0-94b6-87b9737226c0Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 820.9008
Criticism and interpretation : Emotions in literature
spellingShingle 820.9008
Criticism and interpretation : Emotions in literature
Scannell, Michael
The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë
description Charlotte Brontë wrote some memorable criticism of Jane Austen. What particularly affronted her was Jane Austen's treatment of emotion. This suggests grounds for comparison. If conducted historically the comparison makes more sense. It also helps to consider the novel as 'conjectural history', i.e. to assign (some) novels not to the category of make-believe (creating imaginary worlds which only make sense if certain conventions are accepted), nor that of lying (evoking possible but partial worlds for consolation), but that of guesswork (considering what might have happened in this world).
author Scannell, Michael
author_facet Scannell, Michael
author_sort Scannell, Michael
title The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë
title_short The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë
title_full The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë
title_fullStr The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë
title_full_unstemmed The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë
title_sort treatment of emotion in jane austen and charlotte brontë
publisher University of Oxford
publishDate 1975
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.471743
work_keys_str_mv AT scannellmichael thetreatmentofemotioninjaneaustenandcharlottebronte
AT scannellmichael treatmentofemotioninjaneaustenandcharlottebronte
_version_ 1716741254675431424