The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë
Charlotte Brontë wrote some memorable criticism of Jane Austen. What particularly affronted her was Jane Austen's treatment of emotion. This suggests grounds for comparison. If conducted historically the comparison makes more sense. It also helps to consider the novel as 'conjectural histo...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
University of Oxford
1975
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.471743 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-471743 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4717432015-03-19T05:18:32ZThe treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte BrontëScannell, Michael1975Charlotte Brontë wrote some memorable criticism of Jane Austen. What particularly affronted her was Jane Austen's treatment of emotion. This suggests grounds for comparison. If conducted historically the comparison makes more sense. It also helps to consider the novel as 'conjectural history', i.e. to assign (some) novels not to the category of make-believe (creating imaginary worlds which only make sense if certain conventions are accepted), nor that of lying (evoking possible but partial worlds for consolation), but that of guesswork (considering what might have happened in this world).820.9008Criticism and interpretation : Emotions in literatureUniversity of Oxfordhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.471743http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:c06efcb4-b5d6-40e0-94b6-87b9737226c0Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
820.9008 Criticism and interpretation : Emotions in literature |
spellingShingle |
820.9008 Criticism and interpretation : Emotions in literature Scannell, Michael The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë |
description |
Charlotte Brontë wrote some memorable criticism of Jane Austen. What particularly affronted her was Jane Austen's treatment of emotion. This suggests grounds for comparison. If conducted historically the comparison makes more sense. It also helps to consider the novel as 'conjectural history', i.e. to assign (some) novels not to the category of make-believe (creating imaginary worlds which only make sense if certain conventions are accepted), nor that of lying (evoking possible but partial worlds for consolation), but that of guesswork (considering what might have happened in this world). |
author |
Scannell, Michael |
author_facet |
Scannell, Michael |
author_sort |
Scannell, Michael |
title |
The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë |
title_short |
The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë |
title_full |
The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë |
title_fullStr |
The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë |
title_full_unstemmed |
The treatment of emotion in Jane Austen and Charlotte Brontë |
title_sort |
treatment of emotion in jane austen and charlotte brontë |
publisher |
University of Oxford |
publishDate |
1975 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.471743 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT scannellmichael thetreatmentofemotioninjaneaustenandcharlottebronte AT scannellmichael treatmentofemotioninjaneaustenandcharlottebronte |
_version_ |
1716741254675431424 |