The social pathology of a university department

The underlying premise of the research is that the social structure of university departments heavily determines the university experience of their members. There have, however, been very few empirically based investigations of the overall social structure of a university department. A study was con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Stewart Geoffrey Francis
Published: University of Surrey 1974
Subjects:
305
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.447880
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-447880
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4478802015-08-04T03:33:15ZThe social pathology of a university departmentAnderson, Stewart Geoffrey Francis1974The underlying premise of the research is that the social structure of university departments heavily determines the university experience of their members. There have, however, been very few empirically based investigations of the overall social structure of a university department. A study was conducted of the English Department of the Free University, Berlin. It combined three sets of considerations: 1. socio-historical 2. from role theory 3. from the sociology of organisations. Against an assessment of the socio-historical constraints on the University, the academic discipline and the Department, the situation of the main status groups in the Department was examined - from freshmen to professors - but also populations which were just entering or had just left the Department, i. e. school leavers and recent graduates. A lattice of eighteen crosssectional and longitudinal surveys was used. The data collection was by questionnaire, interview, extensive on-site observation and documentary analysis. A set of organisational properties was applied to the findings to determine the institutional efficacy of the Department. On the strength of these operations the condition of the Department is diagnosed as pathological. Beyond illustration of the manifold symptoms, attention is drawn to the cleft between the hidden curriculum of the Department and the ostensible goals of academic effort. While conclusions are drawn about current developments in German universities, the case is seen as a demonstration of the threat of "departmentalism" in the university at large. Finally, a proposal is made suggesting the extension of institutional research in universities to help forestall the phenomena shown in the study305University of Surreyhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.447880http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/2734/ : http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/2735/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 305
spellingShingle 305
Anderson, Stewart Geoffrey Francis
The social pathology of a university department
description The underlying premise of the research is that the social structure of university departments heavily determines the university experience of their members. There have, however, been very few empirically based investigations of the overall social structure of a university department. A study was conducted of the English Department of the Free University, Berlin. It combined three sets of considerations: 1. socio-historical 2. from role theory 3. from the sociology of organisations. Against an assessment of the socio-historical constraints on the University, the academic discipline and the Department, the situation of the main status groups in the Department was examined - from freshmen to professors - but also populations which were just entering or had just left the Department, i. e. school leavers and recent graduates. A lattice of eighteen crosssectional and longitudinal surveys was used. The data collection was by questionnaire, interview, extensive on-site observation and documentary analysis. A set of organisational properties was applied to the findings to determine the institutional efficacy of the Department. On the strength of these operations the condition of the Department is diagnosed as pathological. Beyond illustration of the manifold symptoms, attention is drawn to the cleft between the hidden curriculum of the Department and the ostensible goals of academic effort. While conclusions are drawn about current developments in German universities, the case is seen as a demonstration of the threat of "departmentalism" in the university at large. Finally, a proposal is made suggesting the extension of institutional research in universities to help forestall the phenomena shown in the study
author Anderson, Stewart Geoffrey Francis
author_facet Anderson, Stewart Geoffrey Francis
author_sort Anderson, Stewart Geoffrey Francis
title The social pathology of a university department
title_short The social pathology of a university department
title_full The social pathology of a university department
title_fullStr The social pathology of a university department
title_full_unstemmed The social pathology of a university department
title_sort social pathology of a university department
publisher University of Surrey
publishDate 1974
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.447880
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonstewartgeoffreyfrancis thesocialpathologyofauniversitydepartment
AT andersonstewartgeoffreyfrancis socialpathologyofauniversitydepartment
_version_ 1716815529624207360