The geometry of visual experience

In this thesis I examine what the geometry of visual experience is. This is a question which to some has had an a priori answer, and to some its relevance to philosophy has been considered questionable. I argue that the question is of philosophical concern partly because it generates an interesting...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meadows, Phillip
Published: Durham University 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.441677
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-441677
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4416772015-03-19T05:35:27ZThe geometry of visual experienceMeadows, Phillip2007In this thesis I examine what the geometry of visual experience is. This is a question which to some has had an a priori answer, and to some its relevance to philosophy has been considered questionable. I argue that the question is of philosophical concern partly because it generates an interesting form of the argument from illusion against Direct Realism, and partly because it concerns the phenomenal character of visual experience. I consider and offer objections to a number of arguments, both a priori and empirical, for the conclusion that the geometry of visual experience is not the same as the geometry of the physical environment. Three proposals are argued against: that visual experience underdetermines a geometry; that the geometry is of the spherical non-Euclidean type; and that the geometry is of the hyperbolic non- Euclidean type.153.132Durham Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.441677http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2566/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 153.132
spellingShingle 153.132
Meadows, Phillip
The geometry of visual experience
description In this thesis I examine what the geometry of visual experience is. This is a question which to some has had an a priori answer, and to some its relevance to philosophy has been considered questionable. I argue that the question is of philosophical concern partly because it generates an interesting form of the argument from illusion against Direct Realism, and partly because it concerns the phenomenal character of visual experience. I consider and offer objections to a number of arguments, both a priori and empirical, for the conclusion that the geometry of visual experience is not the same as the geometry of the physical environment. Three proposals are argued against: that visual experience underdetermines a geometry; that the geometry is of the spherical non-Euclidean type; and that the geometry is of the hyperbolic non- Euclidean type.
author Meadows, Phillip
author_facet Meadows, Phillip
author_sort Meadows, Phillip
title The geometry of visual experience
title_short The geometry of visual experience
title_full The geometry of visual experience
title_fullStr The geometry of visual experience
title_full_unstemmed The geometry of visual experience
title_sort geometry of visual experience
publisher Durham University
publishDate 2007
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.441677
work_keys_str_mv AT meadowsphillip thegeometryofvisualexperience
AT meadowsphillip geometryofvisualexperience
_version_ 1716741738672947200