Motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders

Objectives: The aim of Study One was to establish the construct validity of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) for use with an eating disorders population. Once done, than to use the scale to assess changes in motivation due to a brief psycho-education (PE) intervention (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moffett, Matilda
Published: University of Leicester 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.436663
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-436663
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4366632016-12-08T03:27:03ZMotivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disordersMoffett, Matilda2006Objectives: The aim of Study One was to establish the construct validity of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) for use with an eating disorders population. Once done, than to use the scale to assess changes in motivation due to a brief psycho-education (PE) intervention (Study Two). Method: Study One: Clinical data from 160 participants was analysed; 24 diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (AN), 44 diagnosed with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 88 diagnosed with eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). Participants completed the URICA; the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-O); and the Stirling Eating Disorder Scales (SEDS). Study Two: Forty-five participants diagnosed with either AN, BN or EDNOS were recruited. Thirty-Two participants completed the URICA; EDE-Q; and SEDS at three time points; time1 (referral), time 2 (start of a 4-week group based Psycho-education (PE) intervention) and time 3 (end of PE intervention). Results: Study One: Similar to previous findings (McConnaughy et al., 1993, 1989), the URICA was found to be internally consistent (all coefficients exceeding 0.7) and principle component analysis revealed four stages of change (Precontemplation, Contemplation, Action and Maintenance) represented by high loadings on four distinct components. Adjacent stages of change were more highly correlated than non-adjacent stages. Study Two: Contrary to expectation, the PE intervention did not significantly enhance motivation for change. The PE intervention had no significant impact upon specific and non-specific eating disorder symptomatology. Conclusion: The URICA was found to be construct valid with individuals with a range of eating disorders. Further studies are required in order to justify the inclusion of a PE intervention as part of standard treatment for eating disorders.616.85260651University of Leicesterhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.436663http://hdl.handle.net/2381/31226Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.85260651
spellingShingle 616.85260651
Moffett, Matilda
Motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders
description Objectives: The aim of Study One was to establish the construct validity of the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA) for use with an eating disorders population. Once done, than to use the scale to assess changes in motivation due to a brief psycho-education (PE) intervention (Study Two). Method: Study One: Clinical data from 160 participants was analysed; 24 diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (AN), 44 diagnosed with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 88 diagnosed with eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). Participants completed the URICA; the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-O); and the Stirling Eating Disorder Scales (SEDS). Study Two: Forty-five participants diagnosed with either AN, BN or EDNOS were recruited. Thirty-Two participants completed the URICA; EDE-Q; and SEDS at three time points; time1 (referral), time 2 (start of a 4-week group based Psycho-education (PE) intervention) and time 3 (end of PE intervention). Results: Study One: Similar to previous findings (McConnaughy et al., 1993, 1989), the URICA was found to be internally consistent (all coefficients exceeding 0.7) and principle component analysis revealed four stages of change (Precontemplation, Contemplation, Action and Maintenance) represented by high loadings on four distinct components. Adjacent stages of change were more highly correlated than non-adjacent stages. Study Two: Contrary to expectation, the PE intervention did not significantly enhance motivation for change. The PE intervention had no significant impact upon specific and non-specific eating disorder symptomatology. Conclusion: The URICA was found to be construct valid with individuals with a range of eating disorders. Further studies are required in order to justify the inclusion of a PE intervention as part of standard treatment for eating disorders.
author Moffett, Matilda
author_facet Moffett, Matilda
author_sort Moffett, Matilda
title Motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders
title_short Motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders
title_full Motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders
title_fullStr Motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders
title_full_unstemmed Motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders
title_sort motivation for change and psycho-education in the treatment of eating disorders
publisher University of Leicester
publishDate 2006
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.436663
work_keys_str_mv AT moffettmatilda motivationforchangeandpsychoeducationinthetreatmentofeatingdisorders
_version_ 1718400171846402048