Category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia

The experiments presented in this work are aimed at gaining a greater understanding of the semantic impairment in semantic dementia (SD) in terms of modality-specificity and category-specificity, and to consider the implications for the organisation of the semantic system. To this end, the semantic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carroll, Erin Mary Alice
Published: University College London (University of London) 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.435180
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-435180
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4351802016-08-04T03:28:50ZCategory- and modality-specificity in semantic dementiaCarroll, Erin Mary Alice2006The experiments presented in this work are aimed at gaining a greater understanding of the semantic impairment in semantic dementia (SD) in terms of modality-specificity and category-specificity, and to consider the implications for the organisation of the semantic system. To this end, the semantic abilities of a group of twelve SD patients with varying impairment severity were examined using a variety of methods - tests from a traditional semantic battery and novel tests, which examined the verbal and nonverbal knowledge of concepts and the semantic attributes of those concepts. The methods of assessment were directly contrasted and relationships between them explored. Throughout this work, comparisons with normal performance were drawn using data collected from age-matched healthy subjects. Longitudinal analyses of the performance of a subset of the patients were also presented to investigate any decline in patient performance over time. The findings suggest a remarkable degree of consistency in semantic performance in the patient group, regardless of stimulus modality or feature type, with few exceptions. However, this consistency was not reflected in the influence of semantic domain. Some patients showed category-specificity while others did not. These differences could not be explained by reference to psycholinguistic variables or evolutionarily determined categories. Differential processing of feature types was more satisfactory as an explanation but required the implication of more fine-grained distinctions than the binary sensory/functional knowledge classification. Recent models of which consider multiple principles of organisation within the semantic system are more likely to be able to account for all the data showing both consistency and inconsistency within the present cohort of SD patients, and the myriad findings in the semantic memory literature.616.8552University College London (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.435180http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1445346/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.8552
spellingShingle 616.8552
Carroll, Erin Mary Alice
Category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia
description The experiments presented in this work are aimed at gaining a greater understanding of the semantic impairment in semantic dementia (SD) in terms of modality-specificity and category-specificity, and to consider the implications for the organisation of the semantic system. To this end, the semantic abilities of a group of twelve SD patients with varying impairment severity were examined using a variety of methods - tests from a traditional semantic battery and novel tests, which examined the verbal and nonverbal knowledge of concepts and the semantic attributes of those concepts. The methods of assessment were directly contrasted and relationships between them explored. Throughout this work, comparisons with normal performance were drawn using data collected from age-matched healthy subjects. Longitudinal analyses of the performance of a subset of the patients were also presented to investigate any decline in patient performance over time. The findings suggest a remarkable degree of consistency in semantic performance in the patient group, regardless of stimulus modality or feature type, with few exceptions. However, this consistency was not reflected in the influence of semantic domain. Some patients showed category-specificity while others did not. These differences could not be explained by reference to psycholinguistic variables or evolutionarily determined categories. Differential processing of feature types was more satisfactory as an explanation but required the implication of more fine-grained distinctions than the binary sensory/functional knowledge classification. Recent models of which consider multiple principles of organisation within the semantic system are more likely to be able to account for all the data showing both consistency and inconsistency within the present cohort of SD patients, and the myriad findings in the semantic memory literature.
author Carroll, Erin Mary Alice
author_facet Carroll, Erin Mary Alice
author_sort Carroll, Erin Mary Alice
title Category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia
title_short Category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia
title_full Category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia
title_fullStr Category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia
title_full_unstemmed Category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia
title_sort category- and modality-specificity in semantic dementia
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2006
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.435180
work_keys_str_mv AT carrollerinmaryalice categoryandmodalityspecificityinsemanticdementia
_version_ 1718369168506486784