Ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr

This project examines the relationship of doctrine and moral formation or ethics in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr. The general thesis is that McClendon understood ethics to relate to doctrine in such a way that ethics constitutes a type of justification for the truthfulness of doctrinal confes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hamilton, Rex
Published: University of Aberdeen 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.415534
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-415534
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4155342017-04-20T03:33:20ZEthics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, JrHamilton, Rex2004This project examines the relationship of doctrine and moral formation or ethics in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr. The general thesis is that McClendon understood ethics to relate to doctrine in such a way that ethics constitutes a type of justification for the truthfulness of doctrinal confession. After introducing the logic for considering atonement and moral formation together in this manner, the project proceeds by explaining McClendon's "narrative" epistemology. This introductory material is followed by an examination of historical Anabaptism and "postmodernism" as communities of reference that contribute to McClendon's epistemological vision. The project then moves to an explication of McClendon's own presentation of the nature of doctrine (specifically the atonement) and ethics, primarily as seen in his three-volume systematic theology, followed by an analysis of McClendon's presentation of his own epistemological method from his book Convections. The final chapter before the Conclusion examines the way the material in the first 5 chapters is manifest in, and depends on, McClendon's sense of the nature of ecclesiology. The Conclusion then summarizes the argument and draws attention to several areas where McClendon's vision and methodology open to several critical questions. My conclusion is that McClendon's understanding of the nature of the atonement is manifest in his sense of the place and function of moral formation of the church, and that this relationship explains how McClendon understands Christian confession to be justifiably held by the Church.241.092University of Aberdeenhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.415534http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk/R?func=search-advanced-go&find_code1=WSN&request1=AAIU192141Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 241.092
spellingShingle 241.092
Hamilton, Rex
Ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr
description This project examines the relationship of doctrine and moral formation or ethics in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr. The general thesis is that McClendon understood ethics to relate to doctrine in such a way that ethics constitutes a type of justification for the truthfulness of doctrinal confession. After introducing the logic for considering atonement and moral formation together in this manner, the project proceeds by explaining McClendon's "narrative" epistemology. This introductory material is followed by an examination of historical Anabaptism and "postmodernism" as communities of reference that contribute to McClendon's epistemological vision. The project then moves to an explication of McClendon's own presentation of the nature of doctrine (specifically the atonement) and ethics, primarily as seen in his three-volume systematic theology, followed by an analysis of McClendon's presentation of his own epistemological method from his book Convections. The final chapter before the Conclusion examines the way the material in the first 5 chapters is manifest in, and depends on, McClendon's sense of the nature of ecclesiology. The Conclusion then summarizes the argument and draws attention to several areas where McClendon's vision and methodology open to several critical questions. My conclusion is that McClendon's understanding of the nature of the atonement is manifest in his sense of the place and function of moral formation of the church, and that this relationship explains how McClendon understands Christian confession to be justifiably held by the Church.
author Hamilton, Rex
author_facet Hamilton, Rex
author_sort Hamilton, Rex
title Ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr
title_short Ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr
title_full Ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr
title_fullStr Ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr
title_full_unstemmed Ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of Christian doctrine in the work of James Wm. McClendon, Jr
title_sort ethics is theology, theology is ethics : atonement, moral formation, and the justification of christian doctrine in the work of james wm. mcclendon, jr
publisher University of Aberdeen
publishDate 2004
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.415534
work_keys_str_mv AT hamiltonrex ethicsistheologytheologyisethicsatonementmoralformationandthejustificationofchristiandoctrineintheworkofjameswmmcclendonjr
_version_ 1718441573526536192