The morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment

This thesis investigates the nature of the interface between two components of language - morphology and phonology - in children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment (G-SLi), compared to those with typically-developing language. I focus principally on the impact of phonological complexity o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marshall, Chloe Ruth
Published: University College London (University of London) 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.413671
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-413671
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4136712016-06-21T03:20:18ZThe morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairmentMarshall, Chloe Ruth2005This thesis investigates the nature of the interface between two components of language - morphology and phonology - in children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment (G-SLi), compared to those with typically-developing language. I focus principally on the impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection, but I also investigate other areas of rnorpnotogy. More specifically, I show that for G-SLI children:- There exists a phonological impairment that is independent of morphology. This impairment is characterised by the simplification of complex syllable structure, and by syllabic and segmental errors when the word starts with an initial unstressed syllable. There exists an impairment in past tense morphology, characterised by suffix omission, that is independent of phonology. Phonological factors affect past tense morphology. Specifically, suffix omission rates are higher when inflection (i) creates clusters at the word-end or (ii) requires the syllabic allomorph lidJ. Phonological factors also affect plural and present progressive formation. Unlike past tense morphology, derivational morphology is not subject to suffix omission. However, non-target derivational forms result when stimuli are morphologically or phonologtcally complex. I argue that grammar has a modular structure, and I propose that deficits in one or more of the following modules - syntax, morphology and phonology - can impact on past tense inflection. This model, termed the 'Computational Grammatical Complexity* (CGC) hypothesis, can account for why tense is an area of exceptional difficulty for children with SLI. This investigation is underpinned by a rigorous theoretical framework. Not only does using a cognitive scientific and linguistic framework further our understanding of the nature of the deficit in SLI, but SLI provides a valuable testing ground for theories of language acquisition and the representation of language in the brain.401.93University College London (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.413671http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1445744/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 401.93
spellingShingle 401.93
Marshall, Chloe Ruth
The morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment
description This thesis investigates the nature of the interface between two components of language - morphology and phonology - in children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment (G-SLi), compared to those with typically-developing language. I focus principally on the impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection, but I also investigate other areas of rnorpnotogy. More specifically, I show that for G-SLI children:- There exists a phonological impairment that is independent of morphology. This impairment is characterised by the simplification of complex syllable structure, and by syllabic and segmental errors when the word starts with an initial unstressed syllable. There exists an impairment in past tense morphology, characterised by suffix omission, that is independent of phonology. Phonological factors affect past tense morphology. Specifically, suffix omission rates are higher when inflection (i) creates clusters at the word-end or (ii) requires the syllabic allomorph lidJ. Phonological factors also affect plural and present progressive formation. Unlike past tense morphology, derivational morphology is not subject to suffix omission. However, non-target derivational forms result when stimuli are morphologically or phonologtcally complex. I argue that grammar has a modular structure, and I propose that deficits in one or more of the following modules - syntax, morphology and phonology - can impact on past tense inflection. This model, termed the 'Computational Grammatical Complexity* (CGC) hypothesis, can account for why tense is an area of exceptional difficulty for children with SLI. This investigation is underpinned by a rigorous theoretical framework. Not only does using a cognitive scientific and linguistic framework further our understanding of the nature of the deficit in SLI, but SLI provides a valuable testing ground for theories of language acquisition and the representation of language in the brain.
author Marshall, Chloe Ruth
author_facet Marshall, Chloe Ruth
author_sort Marshall, Chloe Ruth
title The morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment
title_short The morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment
title_full The morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment
title_fullStr The morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment
title_full_unstemmed The morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment
title_sort morpho-phonological interface in specific language impairment
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 2005
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.413671
work_keys_str_mv AT marshallchloeruth themorphophonologicalinterfaceinspecificlanguageimpairment
AT marshallchloeruth morphophonologicalinterfaceinspecificlanguageimpairment
_version_ 1718312139570020352