Why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on Schönberg

The centrality to philosophy of the relation between philosophers and artists is as old as philosophy itself. Regardless of whether one accepts Arthur C. Danto's claim that 'philosophy down the ages has consisted in placing codicils to the platonic testament', it is difficult to ignor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kuhlken, Julie
Published: Middlesex University 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.407201
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-407201
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4072012015-03-20T04:52:10ZWhy would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on SchönbergKuhlken, Julie2004The centrality to philosophy of the relation between philosophers and artists is as old as philosophy itself. Regardless of whether one accepts Arthur C. Danto's claim that 'philosophy down the ages has consisted in placing codicils to the platonic testament', it is difficult to ignore the challenge the ancient Greek thinker posed when he excluded artists from his Republic. My thesis takes up this challenge head-on, critically asking why a philosopher would take an artist seriously, why addressing artists is so essential to engaging with society and even the world. As it turns out, this question itself involves several queries. The first wants to understand what it means to take someone seriously at all, to understand that to take seriously is to run the risk of taking too seriously, and thereby to fall into ridicule. The second links these insights into seriousness' non-seriousness to the particular case of philosophers and artists. This is to recognize that for a philosopher the recourse to the artist is a claim about the seriousness, not just of the artist, but also of the world itself. It is the claim that our conception of the world is at stake, is serious. Thirdly, we must account for the model of art and artists in this conception, and grasp that the exemplarity of artists is simultaneously their counter-exemplarity. As such, the exemplarity of the artist is indeed his inappropriateness to the Republic, but also the basis for there being any Republic at all. In order to address these queries, the thesis focuses on three prototypical examples: Friedrich Nietzsche on Richard Wagner, Martin Heidegger on Friedrich Hölderlin, and Theodor Adorno on Arnold Schönberg. In all three cases, the recourse to the artist is central to the philosopher's greater philosophical project, and for each, the artist stands as a potential model for our necessary engagement with the world.701.17Middlesex Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.407201http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/13571/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 701.17
spellingShingle 701.17
Kuhlken, Julie
Why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on Schönberg
description The centrality to philosophy of the relation between philosophers and artists is as old as philosophy itself. Regardless of whether one accepts Arthur C. Danto's claim that 'philosophy down the ages has consisted in placing codicils to the platonic testament', it is difficult to ignore the challenge the ancient Greek thinker posed when he excluded artists from his Republic. My thesis takes up this challenge head-on, critically asking why a philosopher would take an artist seriously, why addressing artists is so essential to engaging with society and even the world. As it turns out, this question itself involves several queries. The first wants to understand what it means to take someone seriously at all, to understand that to take seriously is to run the risk of taking too seriously, and thereby to fall into ridicule. The second links these insights into seriousness' non-seriousness to the particular case of philosophers and artists. This is to recognize that for a philosopher the recourse to the artist is a claim about the seriousness, not just of the artist, but also of the world itself. It is the claim that our conception of the world is at stake, is serious. Thirdly, we must account for the model of art and artists in this conception, and grasp that the exemplarity of artists is simultaneously their counter-exemplarity. As such, the exemplarity of the artist is indeed his inappropriateness to the Republic, but also the basis for there being any Republic at all. In order to address these queries, the thesis focuses on three prototypical examples: Friedrich Nietzsche on Richard Wagner, Martin Heidegger on Friedrich Hölderlin, and Theodor Adorno on Arnold Schönberg. In all three cases, the recourse to the artist is central to the philosopher's greater philosophical project, and for each, the artist stands as a potential model for our necessary engagement with the world.
author Kuhlken, Julie
author_facet Kuhlken, Julie
author_sort Kuhlken, Julie
title Why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on Schönberg
title_short Why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on Schönberg
title_full Why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on Schönberg
title_fullStr Why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on Schönberg
title_full_unstemmed Why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : Nietzsche on Wagner, Heidegger on Hölderlin, Adorno on Schönberg
title_sort why would a philosopher take an artist seriously? : nietzsche on wagner, heidegger on hölderlin, adorno on schönberg
publisher Middlesex University
publishDate 2004
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.407201
work_keys_str_mv AT kuhlkenjulie whywouldaphilosophertakeanartistseriouslynietzscheonwagnerheideggeronholderlinadornoonschonberg
_version_ 1716787038221500416