Improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication

Lack of adherence to long-tenn therapies has been recognised for many years as a major problem, commonly undennining the effectiveness of medical care. The main objectives of this thesis were to evaluate the effect of nurse-led adherence support compared with usual care on adherence, blood pressure...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schroeder, Knut
Other Authors: Peters, Tim
Published: University of Bristol 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.404102
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-404102
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4041022018-10-03T03:21:47ZImproving adherence to blood pressure lowering medicationSchroeder, KnutPeters, Tim2003Lack of adherence to long-tenn therapies has been recognised for many years as a major problem, commonly undennining the effectiveness of medical care. The main objectives of this thesis were to evaluate the effect of nurse-led adherence support compared with usual care on adherence, blood pressure and costs, and to compare a newly developed adherence self-report tool with electronic monitoring. A total of 245 uncontrolled hypertensive patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension were recruited in 22 general practices in Avon. A validation study of an adherence self-report tool compared with electronic monitoring showed that self-report can predict timing compliance at higher levels of adherence. More research is needed on the usefulness of this tool in day-to-day practice and in a more representative study sample. The main study of this thesis, the RCT, compared a nurse-led adherence support consultation followed by a re-inforcement appointment two months later with usual care alone. The main outcomes in this RCT were adherence to blood pressure lowering medication ('timing compliance'), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and costs. There was no evidence of an effect of nurse-led adherence support on timing compliance (difference between means: -1.0,95% CI: -5.1 to 3.1, p=0.63), systolic blood pressure (difference between means: -2.7 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.2 to 1.8, p=0.24) or diastolic blood pressure (0.2, 95% CI: -1.9 to 2.3, p=0.85). With respect to the evaluation of the adherence self-report tool, there is strong evidence that a reduction of one level of self-reported adherence is associated with a decrease in timing compliance of around 5% (p=0.0004). In conclusion, nurse-led adherence support was no more effective than usual care in terms of increasing adherence or reducing blood pressure. Baseline adherence levels were high in both comparison groups, leaving little room for further improvement. In the few participants who did have medication problems, the intervention appeared to be successful, but further research is needed to consolidate this finding.616.132061University of Bristolhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.404102http://hdl.handle.net/1983/799b44ff-e10d-49c6-80a3-363521922f9cElectronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.132061
spellingShingle 616.132061
Schroeder, Knut
Improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication
description Lack of adherence to long-tenn therapies has been recognised for many years as a major problem, commonly undennining the effectiveness of medical care. The main objectives of this thesis were to evaluate the effect of nurse-led adherence support compared with usual care on adherence, blood pressure and costs, and to compare a newly developed adherence self-report tool with electronic monitoring. A total of 245 uncontrolled hypertensive patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension were recruited in 22 general practices in Avon. A validation study of an adherence self-report tool compared with electronic monitoring showed that self-report can predict timing compliance at higher levels of adherence. More research is needed on the usefulness of this tool in day-to-day practice and in a more representative study sample. The main study of this thesis, the RCT, compared a nurse-led adherence support consultation followed by a re-inforcement appointment two months later with usual care alone. The main outcomes in this RCT were adherence to blood pressure lowering medication ('timing compliance'), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and costs. There was no evidence of an effect of nurse-led adherence support on timing compliance (difference between means: -1.0,95% CI: -5.1 to 3.1, p=0.63), systolic blood pressure (difference between means: -2.7 mmHg, 95% CI: -7.2 to 1.8, p=0.24) or diastolic blood pressure (0.2, 95% CI: -1.9 to 2.3, p=0.85). With respect to the evaluation of the adherence self-report tool, there is strong evidence that a reduction of one level of self-reported adherence is associated with a decrease in timing compliance of around 5% (p=0.0004). In conclusion, nurse-led adherence support was no more effective than usual care in terms of increasing adherence or reducing blood pressure. Baseline adherence levels were high in both comparison groups, leaving little room for further improvement. In the few participants who did have medication problems, the intervention appeared to be successful, but further research is needed to consolidate this finding.
author2 Peters, Tim
author_facet Peters, Tim
Schroeder, Knut
author Schroeder, Knut
author_sort Schroeder, Knut
title Improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication
title_short Improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication
title_full Improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication
title_fullStr Improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication
title_full_unstemmed Improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication
title_sort improving adherence to blood pressure lowering medication
publisher University of Bristol
publishDate 2003
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.404102
work_keys_str_mv AT schroederknut improvingadherencetobloodpressureloweringmedication
_version_ 1718757738824073216