Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers

The development and commercialisation of genetically modified (GM) agricultural crops has drawn attention to a complex challenge facing trade diplomacy - the challenge of regulatory regionalism created by social regulatory barriers. Social regulations associated with GM crops have been enacted to en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Isaac, Grant E.
Published: London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London) 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402132
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-402132
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4021322015-06-03T03:22:53ZAgricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriersIsaac, Grant E.2001The development and commercialisation of genetically modified (GM) agricultural crops has drawn attention to a complex challenge facing trade diplomacy - the challenge of regulatory regionalism created by social regulatory barriers. Social regulations associated with GM crops have been enacted to ensure food safety, environmental protection and moral, ethical and religious preferences. Regulatory regionalism exists at the transatlantic level where GM crops approved as safe in North America have been delayed or denied market access in the EU because of divergent social regulations. As domestic social regulations have emerged on the trade agenda trade diplomacy is at a crucial crossroads because the traditional integration approach of trade diplomacy fails to acknowledge the endogenous political economy factors responsible for the social regulations within a particular jurisdiction. The research reveals that maintaining the traditional approach will erode public support for trade diplomacy and marginalise it as a viable force in international integration. Given the shortcomings of the traditional trade approach, this study then identifies a regulatory development and integration framework contributing to regulatory stability and enhancing the potential for transatlantic regulatory integration. This Ideal Regulatory Framework essentially builds social credence into the scientific rationality approach. Social credence is built in by ensuring consumer information, trust and choice. The result is a trade diplomacy approach that contributes to regulatory stability and integration by balancing the competing interests within an operational, dynamic, rules-based approach capable of managing the social concerns associated with advanced technologies such as GM crops.338.476315233London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402132http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2512/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 338.476315233
spellingShingle 338.476315233
Isaac, Grant E.
Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers
description The development and commercialisation of genetically modified (GM) agricultural crops has drawn attention to a complex challenge facing trade diplomacy - the challenge of regulatory regionalism created by social regulatory barriers. Social regulations associated with GM crops have been enacted to ensure food safety, environmental protection and moral, ethical and religious preferences. Regulatory regionalism exists at the transatlantic level where GM crops approved as safe in North America have been delayed or denied market access in the EU because of divergent social regulations. As domestic social regulations have emerged on the trade agenda trade diplomacy is at a crucial crossroads because the traditional integration approach of trade diplomacy fails to acknowledge the endogenous political economy factors responsible for the social regulations within a particular jurisdiction. The research reveals that maintaining the traditional approach will erode public support for trade diplomacy and marginalise it as a viable force in international integration. Given the shortcomings of the traditional trade approach, this study then identifies a regulatory development and integration framework contributing to regulatory stability and enhancing the potential for transatlantic regulatory integration. This Ideal Regulatory Framework essentially builds social credence into the scientific rationality approach. Social credence is built in by ensuring consumer information, trust and choice. The result is a trade diplomacy approach that contributes to regulatory stability and integration by balancing the competing interests within an operational, dynamic, rules-based approach capable of managing the social concerns associated with advanced technologies such as GM crops.
author Isaac, Grant E.
author_facet Isaac, Grant E.
author_sort Isaac, Grant E.
title Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers
title_short Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers
title_full Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers
title_fullStr Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers
title_full_unstemmed Agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers
title_sort agricultural biotechnology and transatlantic trade : an international political economy analysis of social regulatory barriers
publisher London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London)
publishDate 2001
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402132
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacgrante agriculturalbiotechnologyandtransatlantictradeaninternationalpoliticaleconomyanalysisofsocialregulatorybarriers
_version_ 1716804729437159424