Bertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgy

It the revolutionary and humanist/ethical poles of Marxism are to be retained a crucial epistemological distinction must be made between the marxist analysis of History when it refers to class-based societies, and when it refers to the ideal of a communist collective. The normative core of Marxism i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emslie, Barry
Published: University of East London 1988
Subjects:
800
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.383590
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-383590
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3835902015-03-19T03:28:32ZBertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgyEmslie, Barry1988It the revolutionary and humanist/ethical poles of Marxism are to be retained a crucial epistemological distinction must be made between the marxist analysis of History when it refers to class-based societies, and when it refers to the ideal of a communist collective. The normative core of Marxism is to be found, as a matter of logical necessity, in the notion of Communism, whether "primitive" or "mature", and this paradigm is the yardstick by which both class societies and "revolutionary" Marxism/Leninism are to be judged. Marxist aesthetics is privileged in that it is suggested that the literature of class-based, antagonistic societies often implies a classless ideal as a result of. unwittingly or otherwise, exposing the brutalities of exploitation and expropriation. Literature is thus ambivalently placed; as not only a tool of false consciousness and ruling class ideology, but also as an expression of the utopian core of Marxism. Such a position rests upon the jamesonian premise that Marxism is a metacommentary uniquely well-equipped to interpret History. The drama is deemed of especial value in that its tendency to focus on the Subject and the problem of subjectivity evokes the ideal of individual self-fulfilment; an ideal intrinsic to the Communist paradigm. Brecht's development of a Left theatrical practice in the context of an engagement with German politics of the 1920s and 30s and with marxist theory (particularly Lenin's), is examined in detail precisely because it best explicates and underpins this interpretation, not least because Brecht attempted to work through the marxist definitions of History in terms of a radical assault on bourgeois notions of subjectivity in the context, ultimately, of the alternative communist paradigm. There is, therefore, a vital link between the character of Brecht's radical experiments in the theatre and several problems central to marxist theory. This interaction reached a climax at the end of-Brecht's life; a climax which. while a failure in theatrical terms. makes the importance of Marxist Humanism particularly clear.800Marxism and dramaUniversity of East Londonhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.383590http://roar.uel.ac.uk/1229/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 800
Marxism and drama
spellingShingle 800
Marxism and drama
Emslie, Barry
Bertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgy
description It the revolutionary and humanist/ethical poles of Marxism are to be retained a crucial epistemological distinction must be made between the marxist analysis of History when it refers to class-based societies, and when it refers to the ideal of a communist collective. The normative core of Marxism is to be found, as a matter of logical necessity, in the notion of Communism, whether "primitive" or "mature", and this paradigm is the yardstick by which both class societies and "revolutionary" Marxism/Leninism are to be judged. Marxist aesthetics is privileged in that it is suggested that the literature of class-based, antagonistic societies often implies a classless ideal as a result of. unwittingly or otherwise, exposing the brutalities of exploitation and expropriation. Literature is thus ambivalently placed; as not only a tool of false consciousness and ruling class ideology, but also as an expression of the utopian core of Marxism. Such a position rests upon the jamesonian premise that Marxism is a metacommentary uniquely well-equipped to interpret History. The drama is deemed of especial value in that its tendency to focus on the Subject and the problem of subjectivity evokes the ideal of individual self-fulfilment; an ideal intrinsic to the Communist paradigm. Brecht's development of a Left theatrical practice in the context of an engagement with German politics of the 1920s and 30s and with marxist theory (particularly Lenin's), is examined in detail precisely because it best explicates and underpins this interpretation, not least because Brecht attempted to work through the marxist definitions of History in terms of a radical assault on bourgeois notions of subjectivity in the context, ultimately, of the alternative communist paradigm. There is, therefore, a vital link between the character of Brecht's radical experiments in the theatre and several problems central to marxist theory. This interaction reached a climax at the end of-Brecht's life; a climax which. while a failure in theatrical terms. makes the importance of Marxist Humanism particularly clear.
author Emslie, Barry
author_facet Emslie, Barry
author_sort Emslie, Barry
title Bertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgy
title_short Bertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgy
title_full Bertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgy
title_fullStr Bertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgy
title_full_unstemmed Bertolt Brecht and the problem of a Marxist dramaturgy
title_sort bertolt brecht and the problem of a marxist dramaturgy
publisher University of East London
publishDate 1988
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.383590
work_keys_str_mv AT emsliebarry bertoltbrechtandtheproblemofamarxistdramaturgy
_version_ 1716733093739495424