A methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density

A practical evaluation has been made of a methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density by computer analysis of digitised mammograms. It was hypothesised that interval changes in radiographic breast density could be quantified by a method of normalisation to a refer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pearson, Robert Henry
Published: University of Aberdeen 2000
Subjects:
610
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.367436
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-367436
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3674362015-03-19T07:51:43ZA methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal densityPearson, Robert Henry2000A practical evaluation has been made of a methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density by computer analysis of digitised mammograms. It was hypothesised that interval changes in radiographic breast density could be quantified by a method of normalisation to a reference density on the mammograms, namely, the pectoralis major muscle. The bilateral lateral-oblique mammograms of ten patients at a two year interval were selected. These forty mammograms and calibrated test tools films were digitised using a charge-coupled device camera (CCD) and a drum-scanning microdensitometer (DSMD). The DSMD was found to be more suitable for this work due to the highly linear response characteristics, wide latitude of response, uniform and low noise levels, accurate film positioning and the possibility of more rapid image analysis. The CCD had a logarithmic linear response with less wide latitude, less uniform and higher noise levels, and variation introduced due inaccuracy in film positioning. For the DSMD, the difference between the breast region of interest (ROI) pixel value and pectoralis muscle ROI pixel value, was confirmed as the most appropriate for the method of normalisation; for the CCD, the ratio of logarithms was suitable. The importance of very meticulous mammographic technique was highlighted. Difficulties with normalisation were mostly due to non-uniform compression and inadequate inclusion of pectoralis muscle. For the DSMD images, a more rapid 'autotrace' method for outlining the pectoralis muscle ROI was comparable in accuracy to the slower method which took measurements from six small ROIs.610MedicineUniversity of Aberdeenhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.367436Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 610
Medicine
spellingShingle 610
Medicine
Pearson, Robert Henry
A methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density
description A practical evaluation has been made of a methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density by computer analysis of digitised mammograms. It was hypothesised that interval changes in radiographic breast density could be quantified by a method of normalisation to a reference density on the mammograms, namely, the pectoralis major muscle. The bilateral lateral-oblique mammograms of ten patients at a two year interval were selected. These forty mammograms and calibrated test tools films were digitised using a charge-coupled device camera (CCD) and a drum-scanning microdensitometer (DSMD). The DSMD was found to be more suitable for this work due to the highly linear response characteristics, wide latitude of response, uniform and low noise levels, accurate film positioning and the possibility of more rapid image analysis. The CCD had a logarithmic linear response with less wide latitude, less uniform and higher noise levels, and variation introduced due inaccuracy in film positioning. For the DSMD, the difference between the breast region of interest (ROI) pixel value and pectoralis muscle ROI pixel value, was confirmed as the most appropriate for the method of normalisation; for the CCD, the ratio of logarithms was suitable. The importance of very meticulous mammographic technique was highlighted. Difficulties with normalisation were mostly due to non-uniform compression and inadequate inclusion of pectoralis muscle. For the DSMD images, a more rapid 'autotrace' method for outlining the pectoralis muscle ROI was comparable in accuracy to the slower method which took measurements from six small ROIs.
author Pearson, Robert Henry
author_facet Pearson, Robert Henry
author_sort Pearson, Robert Henry
title A methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density
title_short A methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density
title_full A methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density
title_fullStr A methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density
title_full_unstemmed A methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density
title_sort methodology for quantitative evaluation of change in breast parenchymal density
publisher University of Aberdeen
publishDate 2000
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.367436
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsonroberthenry amethodologyforquantitativeevaluationofchangeinbreastparenchymaldensity
AT pearsonroberthenry methodologyforquantitativeevaluationofchangeinbreastparenchymaldensity
_version_ 1716759582183784448