The interpretation of noun noun compounds

This thesis looks at conceptual combination, in particular it investigates how noun noun compounds are interpreted. Several themes run throughout the work. Real compounds (e.g. coat hanger, crab apple) are compared to novel ones (e.g. banjo cactus, zip violin). Also, compounds are examined in each o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Davidson, Oliver Geoffrey
Published: Durham University 1996
Subjects:
150
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.337937
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-337937
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3379372015-03-19T05:39:33ZThe interpretation of noun noun compoundsDavidson, Oliver Geoffrey1996This thesis looks at conceptual combination, in particular it investigates how noun noun compounds are interpreted. Several themes run throughout the work. Real compounds (e.g. coat hanger, crab apple) are compared to novel ones (e.g. banjo cactus, zip violin). Also, compounds are examined in each of the possible permutations of artefacts (A) (e.g. coat, banjo) and natural kinds (N) (e.g. crab, cactus), (AA, AN, NA and NN).Experiments 1 - 4 examine noncompositionality in noun noun compounds. Possible sources of noncompositionality are investigated using both feature listing and feature rating tasks. Although some differences were found, results were similar between different types of compound, evidence of noncompositionality being found in each. The results also confirm that most of the meaning of a noun noim compound is derived from the second constituent (noun2).Experiments 5 and 6 look at two different types of compoimd interpretation - slot filling and property mapping. In experiment 5, slot filling is found to be the preferred interpretation type overall, but property mapping is more common in compounds composed of two natural kinds (NN). Experiment 6 examines possible factors influencing the choice between slot filling and property mapping interpretations. It was found that constituent similarity plays an important role, and also that this interacts with whether or not the constituents have important properties which clash. Experiment 7 looks at compound identification. Results suggest that the first constituent (nounl) may be critical in such tasks. Experiment 8 compares the importance of nounl and noun2 in determining the type of interpretation given to a compound. Neither position is found to be more influential than the other, although relational information does seem to be associated with specific nouns in each position. Throughout the thesis findings are related to current theories of conceptual combination, such as prototype models, the concept specialisation model and theories of compound interpretation by analogy.150Concept combinationDurham Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.337937http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5301/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 150
Concept combination
spellingShingle 150
Concept combination
Davidson, Oliver Geoffrey
The interpretation of noun noun compounds
description This thesis looks at conceptual combination, in particular it investigates how noun noun compounds are interpreted. Several themes run throughout the work. Real compounds (e.g. coat hanger, crab apple) are compared to novel ones (e.g. banjo cactus, zip violin). Also, compounds are examined in each of the possible permutations of artefacts (A) (e.g. coat, banjo) and natural kinds (N) (e.g. crab, cactus), (AA, AN, NA and NN).Experiments 1 - 4 examine noncompositionality in noun noun compounds. Possible sources of noncompositionality are investigated using both feature listing and feature rating tasks. Although some differences were found, results were similar between different types of compound, evidence of noncompositionality being found in each. The results also confirm that most of the meaning of a noun noim compound is derived from the second constituent (noun2).Experiments 5 and 6 look at two different types of compoimd interpretation - slot filling and property mapping. In experiment 5, slot filling is found to be the preferred interpretation type overall, but property mapping is more common in compounds composed of two natural kinds (NN). Experiment 6 examines possible factors influencing the choice between slot filling and property mapping interpretations. It was found that constituent similarity plays an important role, and also that this interacts with whether or not the constituents have important properties which clash. Experiment 7 looks at compound identification. Results suggest that the first constituent (nounl) may be critical in such tasks. Experiment 8 compares the importance of nounl and noun2 in determining the type of interpretation given to a compound. Neither position is found to be more influential than the other, although relational information does seem to be associated with specific nouns in each position. Throughout the thesis findings are related to current theories of conceptual combination, such as prototype models, the concept specialisation model and theories of compound interpretation by analogy.
author Davidson, Oliver Geoffrey
author_facet Davidson, Oliver Geoffrey
author_sort Davidson, Oliver Geoffrey
title The interpretation of noun noun compounds
title_short The interpretation of noun noun compounds
title_full The interpretation of noun noun compounds
title_fullStr The interpretation of noun noun compounds
title_full_unstemmed The interpretation of noun noun compounds
title_sort interpretation of noun noun compounds
publisher Durham University
publishDate 1996
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.337937
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsonolivergeoffrey theinterpretationofnounnouncompounds
AT davidsonolivergeoffrey interpretationofnounnouncompounds
_version_ 1716741931851055104