Shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems

We consider Cr (r ≥ 1 +γ) diffeomorphisms of compact Riemannian manifolds. Our aim is to develop the analytic machinery required to describe the topological symbolic dynamics of sets of weakly hyperbolic orbits. The Pesin set is an example of such a set. For Axiom-A dynamical systems, that is, for d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gaito, Stephen Thomas
Published: University of Warwick 1992
Subjects:
510
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.316479
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-316479
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3164792018-12-11T03:22:12ZShadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systemsGaito, Stephen Thomas1992We consider Cr (r ≥ 1 +γ) diffeomorphisms of compact Riemannian manifolds. Our aim is to develop the analytic machinery required to describe the topological symbolic dynamics of sets of weakly hyperbolic orbits. The Pesin set is an example of such a set. For Axiom-A dynamical systems, that is, for diffeomorphisms which have a uniformly hyperbolic nonwandering set which is the closure of the periodic orbits, this analytic machinery is provided by the Shadowing Lemma. This lemma is a consequence of the Stable Manifold Theorem, and the local product structure of the nonwandering set of an Axiom-A diffeomorphism. Weakly hyperbolic invariant sets, such as the Pesin set, do not, in general, have local product structure. We can however, prove a generalization of the Shadowing Lemma by combining Anosov’s Stability Lemma with the Stable Manifold Theorem. In essence we prove a perturbed Stable Manifold Theorem. In order to deal with weakly hyperbolic orbits we use Pugh and Shub’s graph transform version of Pesin’s Stable Manifold Theorem. Normally, the contraction required to prove either Anosov’s Stability Lemma or the Stable Manifold Theorem, is derived from the hyperbolicity of a “supporting” invariant set. In fact neither of these proofs require this invariance; hyperbolic, or even pseudo-hyperbolic, families of pseudo-orbits are all that they require. This allows us to conclude the existence of shadowing orbits in the neighbourhood of “hyperbolic invariant sets” of numerical simulations of lowdimensional dynamical systems. In particular corresponding to any such numerical “hyperbolic invariant set”, there is a uniformly hyperbolic invariant set of the dynamical system itself.510QA MathematicsUniversity of Warwickhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.316479http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/109461/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 510
QA Mathematics
spellingShingle 510
QA Mathematics
Gaito, Stephen Thomas
Shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems
description We consider Cr (r ≥ 1 +γ) diffeomorphisms of compact Riemannian manifolds. Our aim is to develop the analytic machinery required to describe the topological symbolic dynamics of sets of weakly hyperbolic orbits. The Pesin set is an example of such a set. For Axiom-A dynamical systems, that is, for diffeomorphisms which have a uniformly hyperbolic nonwandering set which is the closure of the periodic orbits, this analytic machinery is provided by the Shadowing Lemma. This lemma is a consequence of the Stable Manifold Theorem, and the local product structure of the nonwandering set of an Axiom-A diffeomorphism. Weakly hyperbolic invariant sets, such as the Pesin set, do not, in general, have local product structure. We can however, prove a generalization of the Shadowing Lemma by combining Anosov’s Stability Lemma with the Stable Manifold Theorem. In essence we prove a perturbed Stable Manifold Theorem. In order to deal with weakly hyperbolic orbits we use Pugh and Shub’s graph transform version of Pesin’s Stable Manifold Theorem. Normally, the contraction required to prove either Anosov’s Stability Lemma or the Stable Manifold Theorem, is derived from the hyperbolicity of a “supporting” invariant set. In fact neither of these proofs require this invariance; hyperbolic, or even pseudo-hyperbolic, families of pseudo-orbits are all that they require. This allows us to conclude the existence of shadowing orbits in the neighbourhood of “hyperbolic invariant sets” of numerical simulations of lowdimensional dynamical systems. In particular corresponding to any such numerical “hyperbolic invariant set”, there is a uniformly hyperbolic invariant set of the dynamical system itself.
author Gaito, Stephen Thomas
author_facet Gaito, Stephen Thomas
author_sort Gaito, Stephen Thomas
title Shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems
title_short Shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems
title_full Shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems
title_fullStr Shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems
title_full_unstemmed Shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems
title_sort shadowing of weakly pseudo-hyperbolic pseudo-orbits in discrete dynamical systems
publisher University of Warwick
publishDate 1992
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.316479
work_keys_str_mv AT gaitostephenthomas shadowingofweaklypseudohyperbolicpseudoorbitsindiscretedynamicalsystems
_version_ 1718800753213046784