The effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software

This thesis investigates the potential of design rationale to support software designers working on error-prone tasks. Throughout the thesis, I dually pursuit theoretical aspects of the design process as well as issues of support environments initially, the literature is reviewed for weak aspects of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iliadis, Georgios P.
Published: Loughborough University 1999
Subjects:
005
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.311065
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-311065
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3110652018-08-07T03:17:11ZThe effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of softwareIliadis, Georgios P.1999This thesis investigates the potential of design rationale to support software designers working on error-prone tasks. Throughout the thesis, I dually pursuit theoretical aspects of the design process as well as issues of support environments initially, the literature is reviewed for weak aspects of the design process, i.e. parts not supported by standard software tools. Our focus turns on the 'breakdowns', which correspond to cognitive difficulties faced by designers Interestingly enough, another research strand emphasizes on the recovery from such difficulties seeing it as facilitation of problem re-framing and generation of ideas. It is suggested that in order to facilitate that type of recovery transition, the decision-making process should be assisted through the sharing of expertise among design stakeholders.005Computer software & programmingLoughborough Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.311065https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/33159Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 005
Computer software & programming
spellingShingle 005
Computer software & programming
Iliadis, Georgios P.
The effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software
description This thesis investigates the potential of design rationale to support software designers working on error-prone tasks. Throughout the thesis, I dually pursuit theoretical aspects of the design process as well as issues of support environments initially, the literature is reviewed for weak aspects of the design process, i.e. parts not supported by standard software tools. Our focus turns on the 'breakdowns', which correspond to cognitive difficulties faced by designers Interestingly enough, another research strand emphasizes on the recovery from such difficulties seeing it as facilitation of problem re-framing and generation of ideas. It is suggested that in order to facilitate that type of recovery transition, the decision-making process should be assisted through the sharing of expertise among design stakeholders.
author Iliadis, Georgios P.
author_facet Iliadis, Georgios P.
author_sort Iliadis, Georgios P.
title The effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software
title_short The effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software
title_full The effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software
title_fullStr The effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software
title_sort effectiveness of argumentative approaches to the design of software
publisher Loughborough University
publishDate 1999
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.311065
work_keys_str_mv AT iliadisgeorgiosp theeffectivenessofargumentativeapproachestothedesignofsoftware
AT iliadisgeorgiosp effectivenessofargumentativeapproachestothedesignofsoftware
_version_ 1718718734416216064