Twentieth-century reworkings of German literature

No work of art stands in isolation. In one way or another it will have evolved from a form that has been created before, and likewise, it may itself have an influence on future developments and trends in a given genre. The literary reworking distinguishes itself by referring openly and explicitly to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sharman, Gundula-Maria
Published: University of Aberdeen 2000
Subjects:
800
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.302481
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-302481
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3024812017-04-20T03:32:37ZTwentieth-century reworkings of German literatureSharman, Gundula-Maria2000No work of art stands in isolation. In one way or another it will have evolved from a form that has been created before, and likewise, it may itself have an influence on future developments and trends in a given genre. The literary reworking distinguishes itself by referring openly and explicitly to a previous <I>fictional</I> model, thus encouraging the reader to draw comparisons and to note contrasts between the model and the reworking. The investigation concentrates on two examples, from each genre, the drama, the novella and the novel. Reworkings of myths and legendary or historical characters have been excluded. Subject of the thesis is (a) an examination of how this link between model and reworking has been established, and (b) the effect the suggested presence of the literary model has on the interpretation of the reworking. With regard to (a) it has been found that each respective writer employs different narrative techniques to establish the link between model and reworking which has been summarized thus: - allusion to classicism: Schiller: <I>Die Jungfrau von Orleans</I> and Brecht: <I>Die heilige Johanna der Schlachthöfe</I>; - ironic reproduction: Hebbel: <I>Maria Magdalena</I> and Franz Xaver Kroetz: <I>Maria Magdalena</I>; - fragmentation: Thomas Mann: <I>Der Tod in Venedig</I> and Wolfgang Koeppen: <I>Der Tod in Rom</I>; - integration: Georg Büchner: <I>Lenz</I> and Peter Schneider: <I>Lenz</I>; - quotation: Goethe: <I>Die Leiden des jungen Werther </I>and Ulrich Plenzdorf: <I>Die neuen Leiden de jungen W</I>.; - character constellation: Goethe: <I>Die Wahlverwandstschaften </I>and John Banville: <I>The Newton Letter</I> With regard to (b) the effect of the reworking when read in conjunction with its literary model is strikingly different in each case, but common to all reworkings is a gain in historical depth, and in each case new themes and issues arise which are not immediately apparent when the reworking is considered on its own.800LiteratureUniversity of Aberdeenhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.302481http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk/R?func=search-advanced-go&find_code1=WSN&request1=AAIU122777Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 800
Literature
spellingShingle 800
Literature
Sharman, Gundula-Maria
Twentieth-century reworkings of German literature
description No work of art stands in isolation. In one way or another it will have evolved from a form that has been created before, and likewise, it may itself have an influence on future developments and trends in a given genre. The literary reworking distinguishes itself by referring openly and explicitly to a previous <I>fictional</I> model, thus encouraging the reader to draw comparisons and to note contrasts between the model and the reworking. The investigation concentrates on two examples, from each genre, the drama, the novella and the novel. Reworkings of myths and legendary or historical characters have been excluded. Subject of the thesis is (a) an examination of how this link between model and reworking has been established, and (b) the effect the suggested presence of the literary model has on the interpretation of the reworking. With regard to (a) it has been found that each respective writer employs different narrative techniques to establish the link between model and reworking which has been summarized thus: - allusion to classicism: Schiller: <I>Die Jungfrau von Orleans</I> and Brecht: <I>Die heilige Johanna der Schlachthöfe</I>; - ironic reproduction: Hebbel: <I>Maria Magdalena</I> and Franz Xaver Kroetz: <I>Maria Magdalena</I>; - fragmentation: Thomas Mann: <I>Der Tod in Venedig</I> and Wolfgang Koeppen: <I>Der Tod in Rom</I>; - integration: Georg Büchner: <I>Lenz</I> and Peter Schneider: <I>Lenz</I>; - quotation: Goethe: <I>Die Leiden des jungen Werther </I>and Ulrich Plenzdorf: <I>Die neuen Leiden de jungen W</I>.; - character constellation: Goethe: <I>Die Wahlverwandstschaften </I>and John Banville: <I>The Newton Letter</I> With regard to (b) the effect of the reworking when read in conjunction with its literary model is strikingly different in each case, but common to all reworkings is a gain in historical depth, and in each case new themes and issues arise which are not immediately apparent when the reworking is considered on its own.
author Sharman, Gundula-Maria
author_facet Sharman, Gundula-Maria
author_sort Sharman, Gundula-Maria
title Twentieth-century reworkings of German literature
title_short Twentieth-century reworkings of German literature
title_full Twentieth-century reworkings of German literature
title_fullStr Twentieth-century reworkings of German literature
title_full_unstemmed Twentieth-century reworkings of German literature
title_sort twentieth-century reworkings of german literature
publisher University of Aberdeen
publishDate 2000
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.302481
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmangundulamaria twentiethcenturyreworkingsofgermanliterature
_version_ 1718441433209241600