Using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme

In policy contexts valuations may be required not only for the most inclusive good considered but also the relevant sub-areas or components which are nested within the broader good. Valuation of differing levels of quantity/quality, referred to here as scope, provides many challenges to the research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Powe, Neil Adrian
Published: University of East Anglia 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.302149
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-302149
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3021492015-03-19T03:18:32ZUsing contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation schemePowe, Neil Adrian2000In policy contexts valuations may be required not only for the most inclusive good considered but also the relevant sub-areas or components which are nested within the broader good. Valuation of differing levels of quantity/quality, referred to here as scope, provides many challenges to the researcher. Through considering the sensitivity of welfare measures to scope and the valuation sequence used, this thesis was undertaken to investigate the difficulties in and prospects for using CV to estimate the non-market value of nested goods. Using a mixed methodology survey design, the case study focuses on the use of the contingent valuation method to estimate non-market benefits from a saline flood alleviation scheme in Broadland, located in Eastern England. A scheme to protect the `whole' area from saline flooding was compared to five separate `part' schemes which would only protect nested sub-areas of Broadland. Insensitivity to scope was observed within both a split sample comparison of `whole' and `part' valuations and a same sample comparison where the `part' scheme was valued first. The prior valuation of the `whole' scheme did induce sensitivity to scope between `whole' and `part' schemes, but this effect can be interpreted in terms of either economic theory, consistency pressures or the use of a more natural valuation sequence. However, the prior valuation of the `whole' scheme also induced split sample sensitivity to good characteristics between the `part' schemes. Overall the explanation for the results given cannot be monopolised by either contingent valuation supporters or their critics. In the case of Broadland flood alleviation, the validity of the valuations presented remains unclear but some interesting findings suggest future directions for research.627.4068Economic value modellingUniversity of East Angliahttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.302149Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 627.4068
Economic value modelling
spellingShingle 627.4068
Economic value modelling
Powe, Neil Adrian
Using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme
description In policy contexts valuations may be required not only for the most inclusive good considered but also the relevant sub-areas or components which are nested within the broader good. Valuation of differing levels of quantity/quality, referred to here as scope, provides many challenges to the researcher. Through considering the sensitivity of welfare measures to scope and the valuation sequence used, this thesis was undertaken to investigate the difficulties in and prospects for using CV to estimate the non-market value of nested goods. Using a mixed methodology survey design, the case study focuses on the use of the contingent valuation method to estimate non-market benefits from a saline flood alleviation scheme in Broadland, located in Eastern England. A scheme to protect the `whole' area from saline flooding was compared to five separate `part' schemes which would only protect nested sub-areas of Broadland. Insensitivity to scope was observed within both a split sample comparison of `whole' and `part' valuations and a same sample comparison where the `part' scheme was valued first. The prior valuation of the `whole' scheme did induce sensitivity to scope between `whole' and `part' schemes, but this effect can be interpreted in terms of either economic theory, consistency pressures or the use of a more natural valuation sequence. However, the prior valuation of the `whole' scheme also induced split sample sensitivity to good characteristics between the `part' schemes. Overall the explanation for the results given cannot be monopolised by either contingent valuation supporters or their critics. In the case of Broadland flood alleviation, the validity of the valuations presented remains unclear but some interesting findings suggest future directions for research.
author Powe, Neil Adrian
author_facet Powe, Neil Adrian
author_sort Powe, Neil Adrian
title Using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme
title_short Using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme
title_full Using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme
title_fullStr Using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme
title_full_unstemmed Using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the Broadland flood alleviation scheme
title_sort using contingent valuation of value nested goods : a case of the broadland flood alleviation scheme
publisher University of East Anglia
publishDate 2000
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.302149
work_keys_str_mv AT poweneiladrian usingcontingentvaluationofvaluenestedgoodsacaseofthebroadlandfloodalleviationscheme
_version_ 1716732448391299072