Alexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894

This thesis intends to show that pogroms in the reign of Alexander III were neither encouraged nor instigated by the government. While other historians have demonstrated why the government could not have been involved in a pogrom policy, a thesis to which the author adds new primary source materials...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mian, Natasha Lea
Published: University of Liverpool 1995
Subjects:
900
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.283501
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-283501
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-2835012016-08-04T03:41:07ZAlexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894Mian, Natasha Lea1995This thesis intends to show that pogroms in the reign of Alexander III were neither encouraged nor instigated by the government. While other historians have demonstrated why the government could not have been involved in a pogrom policy, a thesis to which the author adds new primary source materials, it is possible to go one step further with new information emerging on alternative origins and reasons for the pogroms. It is argued that there was independent anti-Jewish action among the peasantry that clearly shows their capability for self-motivation and organisation. Chapters 1 and 2 review the literature on the Russian peasantry, the nature of the autocracy, the tensions within Russian society and the role of the Jewish population within the Russian Empire until the 1880s. These are the areas on which the crux of the thesis rests. Chapter 3 re-examines the period 1881-1894 in more detail in an effort to understand more clearly Jewish and Russian social perceptions of the pogroms, and how this has led to misconceptions among historians. Chapter 4 looks more closely at the government policy on the Jewish Question, using new data that allows research to take into account the real feelings and concerns that were expressed at the highest levels of government. Chapter 5 considers the same unofficial and frank source of documentation but at lower levels, i. e. police and local officials. From these police reports, comes the factual evidence of the existence of peasant leadership, organisation and movements against authority, and more specifically against Jews. Chapter 6 concludes that by 1881, the autocracy did not control or understand Russian or Jewish society, and it was during the next thirteen years that this became evident. The re-evaluation of available data only serves to show that the pogroms were a clear illustration of this fact.900Russian Jewish populationUniversity of Liverpoolhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.283501Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 900
Russian Jewish population
spellingShingle 900
Russian Jewish population
Mian, Natasha Lea
Alexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894
description This thesis intends to show that pogroms in the reign of Alexander III were neither encouraged nor instigated by the government. While other historians have demonstrated why the government could not have been involved in a pogrom policy, a thesis to which the author adds new primary source materials, it is possible to go one step further with new information emerging on alternative origins and reasons for the pogroms. It is argued that there was independent anti-Jewish action among the peasantry that clearly shows their capability for self-motivation and organisation. Chapters 1 and 2 review the literature on the Russian peasantry, the nature of the autocracy, the tensions within Russian society and the role of the Jewish population within the Russian Empire until the 1880s. These are the areas on which the crux of the thesis rests. Chapter 3 re-examines the period 1881-1894 in more detail in an effort to understand more clearly Jewish and Russian social perceptions of the pogroms, and how this has led to misconceptions among historians. Chapter 4 looks more closely at the government policy on the Jewish Question, using new data that allows research to take into account the real feelings and concerns that were expressed at the highest levels of government. Chapter 5 considers the same unofficial and frank source of documentation but at lower levels, i. e. police and local officials. From these police reports, comes the factual evidence of the existence of peasant leadership, organisation and movements against authority, and more specifically against Jews. Chapter 6 concludes that by 1881, the autocracy did not control or understand Russian or Jewish society, and it was during the next thirteen years that this became evident. The re-evaluation of available data only serves to show that the pogroms were a clear illustration of this fact.
author Mian, Natasha Lea
author_facet Mian, Natasha Lea
author_sort Mian, Natasha Lea
title Alexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894
title_short Alexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894
title_full Alexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894
title_fullStr Alexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894
title_full_unstemmed Alexander III: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in Russian society, 1881-1894
title_sort alexander iii: a pogrom-maker? : capability and culpability in russian society, 1881-1894
publisher University of Liverpool
publishDate 1995
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.283501
work_keys_str_mv AT miannatashalea alexanderiiiapogrommakercapabilityandculpabilityinrussiansociety18811894
_version_ 1718370304707788800