Utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics

In the Introduction I explore the reasons for my enquiry, and outline the inadequacies of some of the existing attempts to determine the aims and purposes of mathematics in education. In Part 1 I discuss the scope and validity of the justification of mathematics on the basis of its supposed usefulne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Huckstep, Peter John
Published: University College London (University of London) 1999
Subjects:
370
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.248711
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-248711
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-2487112018-07-24T03:13:43ZUtility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematicsHuckstep, Peter John1999In the Introduction I explore the reasons for my enquiry, and outline the inadequacies of some of the existing attempts to determine the aims and purposes of mathematics in education. In Part 1 I discuss the scope and validity of the justification of mathematics on the basis of its supposed usefulness. From there I defend the view that, in principle at least, there are different kinds of reasons for learning mathematics. In Parts 2 and 3 I attempt to explain whether or not mathematics is fit for two particular non-utility purposes claimed by various writers, and if so, how. Thus, in Part 2, I examine the rather strong claim that mathematics is afine art, and hence or otherwise that it is a source of aesthetic satisfaction. In Part 3, I explore the claim that mathematics provides mental training. Here I shall show that 'mental training', is a broad notion ranging from the rather moral character training to the more restricted notion of training in logic. Between these extremes lies a more modest notion which I argue is the most plausible. The thesis is thus both a history of ideas and a clarification of the concepts used in describing fairly established purposes and rejecting those that seem to me to be unattainable or at least scarcely attainable by studying mathematics. The reason for the study is twofold. I see it as a particular case of the general enquiry into the aims of education. So that my conclusions should inform those who want to justify the place of mathematics on the curriculum. Also, however, I want to suggest that the purposes of mathematics education are internally related to understanding the subject, so that the pupil will gain understanding from a clearer notion of what he or she is doing mathematics for.370Mathematics educationUniversity College London (University of London)http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.248711http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10020343/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 370
Mathematics education
spellingShingle 370
Mathematics education
Huckstep, Peter John
Utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics
description In the Introduction I explore the reasons for my enquiry, and outline the inadequacies of some of the existing attempts to determine the aims and purposes of mathematics in education. In Part 1 I discuss the scope and validity of the justification of mathematics on the basis of its supposed usefulness. From there I defend the view that, in principle at least, there are different kinds of reasons for learning mathematics. In Parts 2 and 3 I attempt to explain whether or not mathematics is fit for two particular non-utility purposes claimed by various writers, and if so, how. Thus, in Part 2, I examine the rather strong claim that mathematics is afine art, and hence or otherwise that it is a source of aesthetic satisfaction. In Part 3, I explore the claim that mathematics provides mental training. Here I shall show that 'mental training', is a broad notion ranging from the rather moral character training to the more restricted notion of training in logic. Between these extremes lies a more modest notion which I argue is the most plausible. The thesis is thus both a history of ideas and a clarification of the concepts used in describing fairly established purposes and rejecting those that seem to me to be unattainable or at least scarcely attainable by studying mathematics. The reason for the study is twofold. I see it as a particular case of the general enquiry into the aims of education. So that my conclusions should inform those who want to justify the place of mathematics on the curriculum. Also, however, I want to suggest that the purposes of mathematics education are internally related to understanding the subject, so that the pupil will gain understanding from a clearer notion of what he or she is doing mathematics for.
author Huckstep, Peter John
author_facet Huckstep, Peter John
author_sort Huckstep, Peter John
title Utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics
title_short Utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics
title_full Utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics
title_fullStr Utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics
title_full_unstemmed Utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics
title_sort utility and beyond : a critical examination of certain established reasons given for learning mathematics
publisher University College London (University of London)
publishDate 1999
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.248711
work_keys_str_mv AT hucksteppeterjohn utilityandbeyondacriticalexaminationofcertainestablishedreasonsgivenforlearningmathematics
_version_ 1718713694391631872